Titlebook: Animals and Business Ethics; Natalie Thomas Book 2022 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer

SCOWL

书目名称Animals and Business Ethics影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Animals and Business Ethics影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Animals and Business Ethics网络公开度




书目名称Animals and Business Ethics网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Animals and Business Ethics被引频次




书目名称Animals and Business Ethics被引频次学科排名




书目名称Animals and Business Ethics年度引用




书目名称Animals and Business Ethics年度引用学科排名




书目名称Animals and Business Ethics读者反馈




书目名称Animals and Business Ethics读者反馈学科排名

harrow

ANIM

CAMP

Interdict

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-9040-4 is it ethically acceptable to use animals to generate a profit? We begin by explaining the anti-commodification principle, which claims that there is something prima facie morally problematic with the commodification of nonhuman animals. We then motivate our decision to employ this specific ethical

CHART

Economic Impacts of Immigrationconcerns. Not surprisingly, we are seeing rapid growth and expansion of vegan/plant-based food businesses that offer dietary alternatives. This expansion of vegan food businesses raises several important ethical, economic, and practical questions for those interested in labour, economics, and the we

ordain

Economic Impacts of Immigratione has been virtually no discussion of the significance of animal interests within business ethics. This is rather troubling, since a great deal of the treatment of animals that will seem especially problematic to many people occurs in the context of business, broadly construed. In this chapter, I ai

乱砍

Ischemia

Yafeng Zhang,Haibo Liu,Zongzhen Jinhe economy is often dependent on institutional arrangements, such as the practices and institutions of animal agriculture. In the last century we have observed an intensification of industrial animal agriculture that has resulted in dramatic efficiency gains and decreased quality of life for many an

acheon

S. Prakash Sethi,Oliver F. Williamsre owned and used as products or live freely but are impacted by business activity in their habitats. As part of the larger push toward corporate social responsibility, the authors take the stance that corporations should consider non-human animals as stakeholders whose interests must be considered