找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Ancient Logic and Its Modern Interpretations; Proceedings of the B John Corcoran Conference proceedings 1974 D. Reidel Publishing Company,

[复制链接]
楼主: 伤害
发表于 2025-3-28 15:14:48 | 显示全部楼层
Greek Mathematics and Greek Logicped in the first twenty-two chapters of the . and Stoic propositional logic as reconstructed in the twentieth century. The topic I shall consider in this paper is the relation between Greek logic in this sense and Greek mathematics. I have resolved the topic into two questions: (1) To what extent do
发表于 2025-3-28 22:12:46 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-28 23:31:50 | 显示全部楼层
Aristotle’s Natural Deduction Systemic theory as had previously been thought. We construct a mathematical model which reflects certain structural aspects of Aristotle’s logic and we examine both the mathematical properties of the model and the relation of the model to the system of logic envisaged in certain scattered parts of . and .
发表于 2025-3-29 06:18:48 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-29 11:01:12 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-29 14:43:16 | 显示全部楼层
Remarks on Stoic Deductionevant texts is limited, it may nevertheless be possible to answer some of these questions with a considerable degree of certainty. Moreover, with the answers obtained one might be able to narrow the range of possible solutions to other problems concerning Stoic theories of meaning and inference.
发表于 2025-3-29 17:09:03 | 显示全部楼层
Future Research on Ancient Theories of Communication and Reasoningwhat doth not with your rules agree, forgetting all your learning, seek ye first what . rules may be”. It is interesting to reflect on some possible explanations of why it is now possible for us to ‘forget all our learning’ and seek ‘the rules that the ancients had purposed’. Perhaps the most releva
发表于 2025-3-29 21:36:01 | 显示全部楼层
A Panel Discussion on the Future Research in Ancient Logical Theoryhe reader will notice a certain spontaneity and liveliness not usually found in scholarly writings. Some of the speakers would want to revise their remarks were they to be published as scholarly .. Therefore, the reader should take this as a record of free conversation and not as part of the researc
发表于 2025-3-30 01:51:56 | 显示全部楼层
10楼
发表于 2025-3-30 07:39:08 | 显示全部楼层
10楼
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-6-27 07:43
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表