找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Analytic Philosophy and Phenomenology; American University Harold A. Durfee Book 1976 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands 1976 Edmund

[复制链接]
楼主: Forbidding
发表于 2025-3-23 11:44:44 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1407-6Edmund Husserl; Martin Heidegger; concept; phenomenology
发表于 2025-3-23 15:49:33 | 显示全部楼层
978-90-247-1880-1Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands 1976
发表于 2025-3-23 20:28:55 | 显示全部楼层
American University Publications in Philosophyhttp://image.papertrans.cn/a/image/156544.jpg
发表于 2025-3-23 22:55:44 | 显示全部楼层
EDQ Based Direct Time Integration Methods,I want to distinguish the question what Phenomenology is from certain special questions about certain special claims that are made for it.
发表于 2025-3-24 05:25:25 | 显示全部楼层
Development of DQEM Irregular Elements,The kind of confrontation that I propose here is not intended to generate a hybrid offshoot. Each philosophy is an organism which has its internal rules of development. What we may best do is to understand each better by means of the other and, perhaps, formulate new problems that proceed from its encounter.
发表于 2025-3-24 08:35:29 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-31185-8Heidegger and Wittgenstein are naturally to a high degree philosophical contraries. The aim of this article is not to deny this. But in spite of the difference in intention and philosophical attitude there is a similar awareness (consciousness) in both. The purpose of the article is to show this.
发表于 2025-3-24 14:28:41 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 15:09:08 | 显示全部楼层
Basic Description of Bucket Elevators,In this paper I have tried to find some points of comparison between the methods respectively of phenomenology and linguistic analysis. I have tried to show that they are more alike than they appear at first sight, and that in their extreme forms they are as it were “symmetrical” deviations from what may come to be an agreed norm.
发表于 2025-3-24 21:58:39 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 23:43:48 | 显示全部楼层
Husserl and Wittgenstein on LanguageThe kind of confrontation that I propose here is not intended to generate a hybrid offshoot. Each philosophy is an organism which has its internal rules of development. What we may best do is to understand each better by means of the other and, perhaps, formulate new problems that proceed from its encounter.
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-11 14:54
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表