Titlebook: Analogical and Inductive Inference; International Worksh Klaus P. Jantke Conference proceedings 1989 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1989

RODE

Towards representation independence in PAC learning,ls which are as representation independent as possible. We review this development and discuss the advantages of representation independence. Motivated by the research in learning, we propose a framework for studying the combinatorial properties of representations.

strain

LINES

Refined query inference,inally synthesized programs may have anomalies. Thereby we could show that even questions involving only one type of quantifier may aid the learning process in two directions. First, the number of mind changes can be reduced, and second, more function classes become inferrible. On the other hand, th

Induction

Virtues

妨碍

Nested hyper-rectangles for exemplar-based learning,which these points are generalized to become hyper-rectangles. These hyper-rectangles, in turn, may be nested to arbitrary depth inside one another. This representation scheme is sharply different from the usual inductive learning paradigms, which learn by replacing boolean formulae by more general

使激动

Second-order inductive learning,tances of the hypothesis to be learned, but rather instances of a . (i.e., a typical member of the extension) of the hypothesis to be learned. The paradigm is introduced by means of an example problem from the field of conceptual modeling. We analyse the reasons why a naive solution to that problem

overweight

Modes of analogy,different modes of “analogy” and talking about it as if it were just one process. First of all, I have emphasized the underlying process of . that plays a key role in analogy by rendition and certain proportional analogy relations. In understanding and modeling this process lies one half of the prob

VALID

invade

A sketch of analogy as reasoning with equality hypotheses,er understanding of analogical reasoning as well as its relationship to existing logical models of nonmonotonic reasoning..We begin with a brief description of a hypothetical reasoning system called Theorist. Theorist is a nonmonotonic clausal theorem prover that permits consistent instances of hypo