找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: An Unamendable Constitution?; Unamendability in Co Richard Albert,Bertil Emrah Oder Book 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of

[复制链接]
楼主: necrosis
发表于 2025-3-28 14:58:25 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-28 21:39:21 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-29 02:44:48 | 显示全部楼层
Amending the Unamendable: The Case of Article 20 of the German Basic Lawan the derived one which has only the right to amend an existing constitution in the framework allowed by the original one. In other words, parliaments who want to amend the constitutions are limited by the unamendable provisions. In 1968, Parliament of Germany added the 4th paragraph (which provide
发表于 2025-3-29 03:45:06 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-29 09:08:13 | 显示全部楼层
The Unamendability of Amendable Clauses: The Case of the Turkish Constitutiondments under three different constitutional settings, striking down amendments to the normally amendable provisions of the Turkish constitution. In doing so, it relied upon the unamendability clauses. The Court created an intra-constitutional hierarchy based on the unamendable clauses and exercised
发表于 2025-3-29 12:42:00 | 显示全部楼层
Brazil in the Context of the Debate Over Unamendability in Latin Americanal replacements has waned in the last years, Latin America has long been portrayed as the region where changing the constitution is a common pattern. This paper will explore how this debate has taken place in Brazil, a major player in Latin America whose constitutionalism has been rather underexplo
发表于 2025-3-29 16:54:57 | 显示全部楼层
Unamendable Constitutional Provisions and the European Common Constitutional Heritage: A Comparison age, which is a common set of values defined through their constitutional evolution and thanks to the role played by supranational regional organizations, such as the Council of Europe (CoE) and the European Union (EU). This essay discusses the interplay between said common heritage and the unamenda
发表于 2025-3-29 22:20:02 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-30 02:37:44 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-30 07:15:20 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-37943-1. By considerably extending the contours of the basic structure doctrine, the Indian Supreme Court’s decision in the Fourth Judges Case exacerbates the potential for these falsehoods. This chapter considers how these falsehoods have arisen, the attempts to redress them, and what they mean for constitutional interpretation outside of the courts.
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-15 11:59
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表