用户名  找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: An Aristotelian Realist Philosophy of Mathematics; Mathematics as the S James Franklin Book 2014 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmilla

[复制链接]
楼主: 厌氧
发表于 2025-3-23 12:34:23 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 16:49:02 | 显示全部楼层
Non-Deductive Logic in Mathematics addition to methods special to mathematics such as proof, there ought to be a role for ordinary scientific methods such as experiment, conjecture and the confirmation of theories by observations. Those methods should work in mathematics just as well as in science. Mathematics has extra and more cer
发表于 2025-3-23 21:30:12 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 23:00:50 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 02:23:19 | 显示全部楼层
Stephanie Schiemann,Robert Wöstenfeldizations. Aristotle himself described the Platonists arguing that geometry studies perfect lines and circles, which cannot be realized in the physical world and hence must exist in some non-physical realm:
发表于 2025-3-24 08:33:37 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-91079-1er than complex structures, its concern with infinities before small finite structures, its epistemological impasse over how to know about ‘abstract’ objects – comes from its oscillation between Platonism and nominalism, as if those were the only alternatives. So it is desirable to begin with a brie
发表于 2025-3-24 14:44:03 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-91079-1 physical world, so that mathematics is a science of aspects of the world, as much as biology is. The principal objection to that thesis is, ‘Some of the objects of mathematics are . realized in the physical world, such as large infinite numbers’. It may be that the world is finite, in which case in
发表于 2025-3-24 15:13:36 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-91079-1ticularly necessary since it is much less obvious what the answer is for mathematics than it is for sciences like physics, biology or sociology. It is clear enough what properties of things physics studies – properties such as mass and attraction (even if it is hard to say what they have in common t
发表于 2025-3-24 21:14:41 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-91079-1ct-matter, structure or pattern. We survey the historical development with an eye to philosophically significant examples, then address the crucial philosophical question of characterizing precisely what ‘structure’ is.
发表于 2025-3-25 01:31:34 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-23 18:51
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表