找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: An Analysis of Rights; Samuel Stoljar Book 1984 S. J. Stoljar 1984 human rights.law.politics.social science.sociology

[复制链接]
楼主: 空格
发表于 2025-3-26 22:30:53 | 显示全部楼层
Rights and Duties,Normative relationships, whether moral or legal or both, thus break up into dual components in that two-party relations have to include a right on the one hand with a duty on the other. It would be pointless to say that a person . do something without there being other people related to that ‘may’;
发表于 2025-3-27 02:34:37 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-30560-7nant, or the right to compete in trade, or the right to picket.. We shall call these defensive rights, sometimes called liberties or liberty-rights, to distinguish them from rights with correlative duties or fully assertive rights.
发表于 2025-3-27 08:54:59 | 显示全部楼层
Mike Pedler,Tom Boydell,John Burgoynehole, but with the object of re-examining, as it happens very critically, his three central themes: (a) his distinction between claims and liberties, (b) his views of the ‘no-right’, as he called a liberty’s correlative, and (c) his views of powers and immunities.
发表于 2025-3-27 09:44:28 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-27 15:23:57 | 显示全部楼层
,Tod eines Soldaten / Tod eines Märtyrers, limb refer to a person’s physical or mental integrity: he is to be free from compulsion or other avoidable interference, whereas the right to property extends this immunity to things, or assets, sometimes opportunities.
发表于 2025-3-27 18:40:09 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-27 23:06:22 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-28 03:19:23 | 显示全部楼层
From Positive to Natural Rights,ight which is contained in a ‘literary’ source, be this an oral tradition or a written law, sources through which positive rights thus declare their existence, the sources being those which the institutional operators recognise as authoritative.
发表于 2025-3-28 08:14:46 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-28 14:20:58 | 显示全部楼层
The Limits of Rights,ally handicapped who lack the intellectual capacity even to appreciate rights? Still it has long been accepted, both in law and morals, that a child has rights just as has the lunatic. What we have to discuss is why, theoretically, this should be so.
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-1 19:54
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表