找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Altmetrics for Research Outputs Measurement and Scholarly Information Management; International Altmet Mojisola Erdt,Aravind Sesagiri Raamk

[复制链接]
楼主: affront
发表于 2025-3-25 04:46:24 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-25 08:24:55 | 显示全部楼层
Monitoring the Broader Impact of the Journal Publication Output on Country Level: A Case Study for Aal Sciences. The relative insignificance in the Arts & Humanities’ is noteworthy. Our study confirms very low correlation values between the different measures traced in PlumX and supports the hypothesis that these metrics should rather be considered as complementary sources. High correlations betwe
发表于 2025-3-25 14:39:49 | 显示全部楼层
How Do Scholars Evaluate and Promote Research Outputs? An NTU Case Studyon. Furthermore, we found that the main methods used to promote research outputs are attending academic conferences and publishing papers in journals. However, NTU researchers also embark on using social networking sites to disseminate new findings. The results of this study contribute to the previo
发表于 2025-3-25 18:39:43 | 显示全部楼层
Scientific vs. Public Attention: A Comparison of Top Cited Papers in WoS and Top Papers by Altmetricle of these papers with high altmetric scores to see the underlying patterns and characteristics that motivate high public attention. In parallel we have analyzed top 100 highly cited papers from the same year. Our objective in this empirical study is to examine the similarities and distinguishing f
发表于 2025-3-25 22:22:30 | 显示全部楼层
Field-Weighting Readership: How Does It Compare to Field-Weighting Citations?. We see that there is a strong correlation between the number of papers cited and read per country. Overall, per subject area for the most prolific countries, FWCI and FWRI values tend to be close. Variations per country tend to hold true per field. FWRI appears to be a robust metric that can offer
发表于 2025-3-26 04:09:51 | 显示全部楼层
A Comparative Investigation on Citation Counts and Altmetrics Between Papers Authored by Top Universpapers. Comparative results showed that university-authored papers received slightly higher citation counts than company-authored papers, while company-authored papers gained considerably more attention online. In addition, when we focused on the most impactful papers, i.e., the papers with the high
发表于 2025-3-26 05:16:52 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 09:11:08 | 显示全部楼层
Altmetrics for Research Outputs Measurement and Scholarly Information ManagementInternational Altmet
发表于 2025-3-26 13:20:51 | 显示全部楼层
Mojisola Erdt,Aravind Sesagiri Raamkumar,Yin-Leng
发表于 2025-3-26 19:59:07 | 显示全部楼层
Towards Greater Context for Altmetricsh online to truly understand what altmetrics mean and how they should be interpreted. I explore several ways that the research community and data providers alike can help those who use altmetrics in evaluation move from “data” to “wisdom”.
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-2 12:20
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表