找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Althusser and Pasolini; Philosophy, Marxism, Agon Hamza Book 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016 Louis Althusser.Pier

[复制链接]
查看: 53146|回复: 59
发表于 2025-3-21 17:05:56 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
期刊全称Althusser and Pasolini
期刊简称Philosophy, Marxism,
影响因子2023Agon Hamza
视频video
图书封面Titlebook: Althusser and Pasolini; Philosophy, Marxism, Agon Hamza Book 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016 Louis Althusser.Pier
影响因子 Agon Hamza offers an in-depth analysis of the main thesis of Louis Althusser’s philosophical enterprise alongside a clear, engaging dissection of Pier Paolo Pasolini’s most important films. There is a philosophical, religious, and political relationship between Althusser’s philosophy and Pier Paolo Pasolini’s films.  Hamza teases out the points of contact, placing specific focus on critiques of ideology, religion, ideological state apparatuses, and the class struggle. The discussion, however, does not address Althusser and Pasolini alone. Hamza also draws on Spinoza, Hegel, Marx, and Žižek to complete his study. Pasolini’s films are a treasure-trove of Althusserian thought, and Hamza ably employs Althusserian terms in his reading of the films. .Althusser and Pasolini. provides a creative reconstruction of Althusserian philosophy, as well as a novel examination of Pasolini’s film from the perspective of the filmmaker’s own thought and Althusser’s theses.  
Pindex Book 2016
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Althusser and Pasolini影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Althusser and Pasolini影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Althusser and Pasolini网络公开度




书目名称Althusser and Pasolini网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Althusser and Pasolini被引频次




书目名称Althusser and Pasolini被引频次学科排名




书目名称Althusser and Pasolini年度引用




书目名称Althusser and Pasolini年度引用学科排名




书目名称Althusser and Pasolini读者反馈




书目名称Althusser and Pasolini读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 23:24:55 | 显示全部楼层
Contextualization difficult question: where does one begin? Every beginning requires an assumption, and yet the idea of a beginning is that it does not include an assumption, that it is prior to any assumption. One has to ask, where does and how does one begin from? This question gets a further complicated twist whe
发表于 2025-3-22 01:03:38 | 显示全部楼层
Periodization of him.” To flirt with Hegelian terminology, I would argue that the philosophy of Marxism reached its notion with Althusser in the philosophical and ideological conjuncture of his time. As elaborated in the Introduction (Chap. .), the conjunctures that defined his work were different and therefore
发表于 2025-3-22 07:42:07 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 12:26:45 | 显示全部楼层
Structural Causalitynt endeavor to overcome Hegelian dialectics. But, the question is: whether he really succeeded in doing so? Through the concept of structural causality, Althusser opposed the conventional conceptions of causality (linear and expressive). Some of Althusser’s commentators (such as Ted Breton) argued t
发表于 2025-3-22 13:59:30 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 18:28:55 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 23:13:52 | 显示全部楼层
Proletariat of Human Condition Versus the Proletariat of Laborry texts which attempted to read the predicament of the beginning of the Cold War. The fear of atomic bombs as a consequence of the Cold War was indeed real, but “proletarization” of the people (“we are all victims”) from all classes of the social whole. The Marxist side of Althusser comes to say th
发表于 2025-3-23 01:43:13 | 显示全部楼层
Christian Materialism one to another. The tradition of . has proven us that it is possible to suture Marxism and Christianity. However, the main question is: whether it is possible to be a materialist (or a Marxist) without going through the religious opus? Or even better: is it possible to be a materialist (and in this
发表于 2025-3-23 08:02:50 | 显示全部楼层
Antiphilosophyill remain in the terrain of philosophy? “The truth” and “meaning” have always been antagonistic categories: in Badiou’s philosophy, the rupture between truth and sense marks the struggle between philosophy and antiphilosophy. In Badiou’s thought, the emergence of the antiphilosophical tradition (wh
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-19 18:23
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表