找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Algorithmic Game Theory; 15th International S Panagiotis Kanellopoulos,Maria Kyropoulou,Alexandr Conference proceedings 2022 The Editor(s)

[复制链接]
楼主: 无法仿效
发表于 2025-3-25 07:00:48 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-25 08:06:46 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-25 11:52:03 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-25 17:45:47 | 显示全部楼层
How Bad is the Merger Paradox?e a decline in their overall profit compared to their total pre-merger profit. This phenomenon is more striking in small oligopolistic markets, where mergers increase market concentration and may hence trigger a substantial increase in prices. In this paper, we investigate the severity of the merger
发表于 2025-3-25 21:49:12 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 02:16:35 | 显示全部楼层
Lookahead Auctions with Poolingd more fair than the optimal auction. Indeed, it anonymously selects a provisional winner by a symmetric ascending-price process, and only then uses a personalized posted price. A . auction extracts at least 1/2 of the optimal revenue, even under a correlated value distribution. This bound is tight,
发表于 2025-3-26 05:43:33 | 显示全部楼层
Budget Feasible Mechanisms for Procurement Auctions with Divisible Agentsed fractionally, there exists an optimal mechanism with approximation guarantee . under the small bidder assumption. We study the divisible case without the small bidder assumption, but assume that the true costs of the agents are bounded by the budget. This setting lends itself to modeling economic
发表于 2025-3-26 09:34:02 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 16:22:04 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 20:02:10 | 显示全部楼层
Simultaneous Contests with Equal Sharing Allocation of Prizes: Computational Complexity and Price ofisfy some contest-specific criterion, and the value of this prize to a winner decreases as the number of winners increases. The players produce outputs for a set of activities, and the winning criteria of the contests are based on these outputs. We consider two variations of the model: (i) players h
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-1 09:43
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表