Titlebook: Al-Jazeera’s “Double Standards” in the Arab Spring; A Peace Journalism A Zainab Abdul-Nabi Book 2022 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The

职业拳击手

Malaise

,Bahrain’s Uprising: Pro-democracy Protests or Sectarian Movement?,n the streets of Manama, while the majority of AJE-N&F (75% and 100%) delegitimised them, stating that they were deployed to “quell protesters”. The chapter argues that the lack of inclusion of PJ frames in AJA led to the framing of the Bahraini uprising as a “sectarian conflict” between Shia and Su

Annotate

,Syria’s CWs Coverage (2013): Peace Deal or Military Action to “Punish” the Perpetrator?, Yet, AJE’s commitment to objective reporting standards has enabled it to be more People-Orientated and less emotive, polarising and sectarian than AJA. The chapter argues that the absence of PJ frames in the coverage, lack of “reflexivity” and the reporting of officials’ claims at face value have a

自然环境

防水

持久

Conclusion,ainst the country in 2013. The chapter also argues that Qatar’s double standard policy in Bahrain and Syria in the beginning of the Arab uprising manifested in the channels’ coverage of both conflicts. The shift in Qatar’s foreign policy at a later stage, when ties between Doha and Manama deteriorat

crucial

令人心醉

LEER

Al-Jazeera’s “Double Standards” in the Arab Spring978-3-031-14279-6

拍下盗公款

,Why “Peace Journalism” and Why Al-Jazeera’s Coverage of Bahrain and Syria?,s: (1) the extent of applying Peace Journalism (PJ) frames in Al-Jazeera’s coverage of Bahrain’s uprising (from 2011 to 2021) and Syria’s second chemical weapons (CW) attack (in 2013), (2) the extent of conformity between the Al-Jazeera coverage of both conflicts and Qatar’s foreign policy and (3) t