Titlebook: Airbus Industrie; Conflict and Coopera Steven McGuire Book 1997 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 1997 Abstrac

公款

书目名称Airbus Industrie影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Airbus Industrie影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Airbus Industrie网络公开度




书目名称Airbus Industrie网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Airbus Industrie被引频次




书目名称Airbus Industrie被引频次学科排名




书目名称Airbus Industrie年度引用




书目名称Airbus Industrie年度引用学科排名




书目名称Airbus Industrie读者反馈




书目名称Airbus Industrie读者反馈学科排名

思想

Cooperation in International Political Economy,national cooperation, there is widespread agreement on a working definition.. Cooperation arises, ‘when actors adjust their behaviour to the actual or anticipated preferences of others, through a process of policy coordination’.. Cooperation in the Airbus case should manifest itself as the adjustment of European Community and US trade policies.

博爱家

Book 1997 understanding this trade dispute, the author casts light on broader issues of international cooperation by focusing on the bilateral trade negotiations that took place between 1979 and 1992. He considers the role played by aerospace firms, the GATT and the transatlantic alliance in shaping this cooperative outcome.

大火

Das Management der lernenden Organisationperation in 1970 and throughout the 1980s caused increasing concern among American government and industry officials. Bilateral EC-US trade diplomacy over Airbus resolved the dispute in 1992 with the signing of an agreement governing international trade in civilian aerospace. In essence, we seek to

Inflated

防御

增减字母法

Methodische Konzeption der Untersuchung,ts of the A300 including the critical sale to Eastern Airlines, and 2. the admission of the United Kingdom back into the consortium. Second, it explores the first, and often overlooked, arena of US-EC conflict over Airbus, namely, the use of subsidized export finance as a weapon in the struggle for

赞美者

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-93417-8de the focus for the trade friction over Airbus — the GATT Agreement on Trade in Civil Aircraft. The Agreement sought to introduce a measure of discipline over government influence on trade in the civil aircraft sector. This process was initiated by the United States government, when President Carte

ALIEN

Grundlagen des Innovationsmanagements,T accord and regarded it as a good, if not foolproof, agreement protecting US firms from unfair competition. However, the 1980s saw the trade dispute intensify, not subside. By 1982, it was clear that the GATT accord was not going to offer the protection that American firms had hoped. Gradually both

albuminuria

Das Management radikaler Innovationenbus consortium had launched three aircraft programmes (A300, A310 and A320) in relatively quick succession and was now planning to undertake another. It was doing this without any clear indication that the existing programmes were making any money for the consortium. American anger at this developme