找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Agriculture in the Uruguay Round; K. A. Ingersent (Senior Research Fellow),A. J. Ray Book 1994 K. A. Ingersent, A. J. Rayner and R. C. Hin

[复制链接]
查看: 34611|回复: 46
发表于 2025-3-21 20:06:29 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
期刊全称Agriculture in the Uruguay Round
影响因子2023K. A. Ingersent (Senior Research Fellow),A. J. Ray
视频video
图书封面Titlebook: Agriculture in the Uruguay Round;  K. A. Ingersent (Senior Research Fellow),A. J. Ray Book 1994 K. A. Ingersent, A. J. Rayner and R. C. Hin
影响因子Agriculture was a major item on the agenda of the Uruguay Round of multilateral trade negotiations under the auspices of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), launched in 1986. In this specially commissioned volume the national positions on agriculture taken up by the major players during the course of these negotiations are set out and analysed, country by country, by a team of internationally renowned experts. The editors have selected and ordered the studies to provide a coherent assessment and synthesis of the main issues and areas of controversy raised by the negotiations. Examination of the reasons for the holding of different national perspectives on the issue of agricultural policy and trade reform helps to explain why reaching international agreement in this area of the GATT negotiations has been so elusive.
Pindex Book 1994
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Agriculture in the Uruguay Round影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Agriculture in the Uruguay Round影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Agriculture in the Uruguay Round网络公开度




书目名称Agriculture in the Uruguay Round网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Agriculture in the Uruguay Round被引频次




书目名称Agriculture in the Uruguay Round被引频次学科排名




书目名称Agriculture in the Uruguay Round年度引用




书目名称Agriculture in the Uruguay Round年度引用学科排名




书目名称Agriculture in the Uruguay Round读者反馈




书目名称Agriculture in the Uruguay Round读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 23:00:59 | 显示全部楼层
The US Perspective,ent agricultural and trade policies. From the country’s beginning an export market was taken for granted as the natural order of things and national trade policy consisted essentially of arguments over tariffs and customs duties. After more than a century of this, World War I should have awakened th
发表于 2025-3-22 02:02:34 | 显示全部楼层
The EC Perspective,the structure of world agricultural trade and earlier rounds of GATT negotiations. This is followed by a short section on the Punta del Este Declaration which launched the UR in 1986. There next follows a longer section dealing with the evolution of the EC stance on agricultural policy and trade ref
发表于 2025-3-22 04:49:47 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 10:48:10 | 显示全部楼层
The Canadian Perspective,n policies of other nations. More recently, Canada’s economy and taxpayers and the crops sector of its agriculture have been the victims of the competitive subsidization of grain and oilseed exports by the agricultural super-powers, the United States (US) and the European Community (EC). Canada ther
发表于 2025-3-22 14:25:51 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 20:55:42 | 显示全部楼层
The LDC Perspective, of protectionism have a number of obvious consequences for world agricultural markets, and thus for developing countries. It is hoped that the Uruguay Round will reverse the tide of protectionism, and so alleviate some of the harm done, but as I shall argue below not every ostensibly successful con
发表于 2025-3-23 01:10:21 | 显示全部楼层
The Food Industry Perspective,hape has been clear, on the basis that agreement is ultimately reached. As a consequence, it has been possible to start drawing up a provisional assessment of how far the food industry’s aims have been met in the Round. The assessment had to remain provisional as the text of the agricultural part of
发表于 2025-3-23 01:29:31 | 显示全部楼层
Perspectives on EC Agricultural Policy Reform, still unresolved problem of the reform of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP). In order to simplify the issues at stake, two principal points of view on the CAP reform problem will be discussed and analysed in this chapter, namely the ‘social’ and the ‘sectoral’ perspective. These two perspectives
发表于 2025-3-23 07:35:26 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-9 05:57
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表