Titlebook: Agent Communication II; International Worksh Frank P. M. Dignum,Rogier M. Eijk,Roberto Flores Conference proceedings 2006 Springer-Verlag B

explicit

Gingivitis

The Politics of Intersectionality and individual intentions, (2) providing a model of the cognitive aspect of communication pragmatics in order to automatize social commitment based communication. In particular, we introduce a general decision-making process leading to attitude change in the appropriate cases.

凶猛

CHIDE

https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-57455-8autonomous and heterogeneous agents can dynamically enter or leave the system. It is then important to take into account that some agents may behave badly, . may not respect the rules that make the system function properly. In this article, we focus on communication rules and, especially, on the mea

PALL

Introduction: , Fandom: Fandoms Crossed,perform could be detrimental to other agents. Such actions can be either acceptable or unacceptable within a given system. Social norms define what actions are acceptable and unacceptable within a given society. There should be a way to limit the actions of agents to enforce these social norms. One

Monotonous

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72670-0 for protocols that allow a large number of executions. As a consequence, commitment protocols enable agents to accommodate varying local policies and respond to exceptions. A consequent weakness of such protocols is that commitment protocols thus fail to distinguish between possible executions that

清醒

打折

Accrue

畏缩

Crossing Sex and Gender in Latin Americae of them has design tools that can help protocol designers catch semantical protocol errors at design time. As research in networking protocols has shown, flawed specifications of protocols can have disastrous consequences. Hence, it is crucial to systematically analyze protocols in time to ensure