找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Against Theory of Mind; Ivan Leudar,Alan Costall Book 2009 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2009 empirical r

[复制链接]
楼主: 复杂
发表于 2025-3-23 12:54:30 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 16:41:09 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 18:33:34 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 01:33:11 | 显示全部楼层
Do Animals Need a ‘Theory of Mind’?How should we regard the Theory ‘Theory of Mind’ (hereafter TToM.) in relation to animals? Is it a brave attempt, long overdue, to embrace the view that the animal world is mindful?
发表于 2025-3-24 04:55:24 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 08:25:29 | 显示全部楼层
Lecture Notes in Computer Science thought of as a model of communication. We find that ToMism has roots in Noam Chomsky’s psychology, and Paul Grice’s work on meaning. It is based on their ideas, inherits some of their problems but adds little new. What is new in ToMism in fact makes matters worse by profoundly intellectualizing so
发表于 2025-3-24 12:34:04 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 16:07:46 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 21:07:20 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-25 02:15:50 | 显示全部楼层
Luisa Franchina,Guido Carlomagnoction in a ‘theory of mind mechanism’, resulting in ‘mindblindness’. To establish this point, the chapter takes up two interesting ideas in the ‘Theory of Mind’ literature, but purged of their Cartesianism: first that the study of autism does indeed provide us with critical insights into the develop
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-20 08:38
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表