Titlebook: Against Plagiarism; A Guide for Editors Yuehong (Helen) Zhang Book 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive l

耐寒

Semiotics of chemical inscriptions,h as CrossCheck). It may be, for example, that the original language of publication is unlikely to reach one part of the author’s intended readership. This raises the difficult question of whether or not this constitutes duplicate publication.

fidelity

Adornment

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27198-5play a large part in decreasing the incidence of misconduct, by making individuals realise that certain behaviour is inappropriate, by creating an awareness of ethical issues, and by introducing the concept of good practice in scientific research and publication from an early age’.

健忘症

Identity, Interstitiality and Diaspora,r’s starting. And as signaled by the University of Oxford’s website ‘avoiding plagiarism is not simply a matter of making sure your references are all correct, or changing enough words so the examiner will not notice your paraphrase; it is about deploying your academic skills to make your work as good as it can be’.

埋伏

没有准备

Interpretive graphicacy in practice,Plagiarism is a form of academic dishonesty, and the importance of honesty in human society is not a new topic!

Pageant

https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3376-1In our first survey (see Chap. .), we noticed some significant differences in the responses to some of the questions between the subject areas of Biomedicine and Biotechnology, and Computers and Electronics. We therefore decided to conduct a further investigation focusing on these key differences in approach in these disciplinary fields.

habile

Rosemary J. Stevenson,Kerry M. SimsAs comments by . in 2010, ‘Major science publishers are gearing up to fight plagiarism… including Elsevier and Springer, are set to roll out software across their journals that will scan submitted papers for identical or paraphrased chunks of text that appear in previously published articles [.]’.

无孔

预兆好