Titlebook: Adversarial Political Interviewing; Worldwide Perspectiv Ofer Feldman Book 2022 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under excl

口语

书目名称Adversarial Political Interviewing影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Adversarial Political Interviewing影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Adversarial Political Interviewing网络公开度




书目名称Adversarial Political Interviewing网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Adversarial Political Interviewing被引频次




书目名称Adversarial Political Interviewing被引频次学科排名




书目名称Adversarial Political Interviewing年度引用




书目名称Adversarial Political Interviewing年度引用学科排名




书目名称Adversarial Political Interviewing读者反馈




书目名称Adversarial Political Interviewing读者反馈学科排名

易弯曲

假设

Keshan-disease

顾客

容易生皱纹

Aristotelian Framing in Political Discourse: A Case Study of Malaysian Prime Minister Muhyiddin Yasshis chapter focuses on a televised interview involving Muhyiddin Yassin, who was declared prime minister of Malaysia in February 2020 after Mahathir Mohamad’s abrupt resignation. Muhyiddin’s administration was regarded adversely from the start, with many quarters labelling it a “backdoor” government

泄露

Beyond the Question–Answer Format: How Montenegrin Interviewers Depart from the “Normative” Politicahors call “normative,” might be initiated by the interviewer (IR) and the interviewee (IE). In this chapter, I study the IR-initiated departures from this format in a corpus of eight Montenegrin TV political interviews. I mainly rely on the model of departures from the questioning stance in news and

CON

Campaign

Argumentative Strategies and Self-image Projection in Spanish Political Interviews, the interviewers, and the interviewees. The methodology used is Discourse Analysis. I take into account socio-cultural approaches, particularly the strategies of social image projection based on Goffman’s theories and their manifestation in the paradigms of politeness and impoliteness. This is a p

善变

Crisis Response Strategies in Political Interviews: A European Union Perspectiveinterviews. As political interviews are accountability practices, crisis responses by political actors are seen as persuasive attempts at (re)enacting reputation and creating citizen trust. In addition to explaining the argumentative nature of political interviews, and how it constrains crisis respo