Titlebook: Advancing Interdisciplinary Approaches to International Relations; Steve A. Yetiv,Patrick James Book 2017 The Editor(s) (if applicable) an

anus928

Hawkish Biases and the Interdisciplinary Study of Conflict Decision-Making,ases and conflict, they offer a new and developed formulation based on the excellent insight of Nobel Prize winner Daniel Kahneman in the field of psychology and Jonathan Renshon’s knowledge of IR and conflict.

反省

Inculcate

Pushing Boundaries in the Study of International Relations,upon multiple disciplines and sub-fields ranging from psychology to history to illuminate international relations and especially international conflict. In the process, the authors offer new perspectives on conflict that also illuminate a neglected actor in the study of international relations: the

瘙痒

纵欲

Hawkish Biases and the Interdisciplinary Study of Conflict Decision-Making,vor hawkish decisions in conflict situations. By “hawkish,” they refer to a propensity for suspicion, hostility and aggression in the conduct of conflict, and for less cooperation and trust when the resolution of a conflict is on the agenda. While much extant work examines links between cognitive bi

invulnerable

Analogy

Technology, Conflict and International Relations,on-making processes, thus adding another window on government behavior and international conflict. A technology-driven skill revolution has also contributed to the emergence of new actors (non-governmental organizations and individuals), and technological evolution has reshaped armed conflict and re