Titlebook: Advances in Cryptology – ASIACRYPT 2005; 11th International C Bimal Roy Conference proceedings 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Harding

书目名称Advances in Cryptology – ASIACRYPT 2005影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Advances in Cryptology – ASIACRYPT 2005影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Advances in Cryptology – ASIACRYPT 2005网络公开度




书目名称Advances in Cryptology – ASIACRYPT 2005网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Advances in Cryptology – ASIACRYPT 2005被引频次




书目名称Advances in Cryptology – ASIACRYPT 2005被引频次学科排名




书目名称Advances in Cryptology – ASIACRYPT 2005年度引用




书目名称Advances in Cryptology – ASIACRYPT 2005年度引用学科排名




书目名称Advances in Cryptology – ASIACRYPT 2005读者反馈




书目名称Advances in Cryptology – ASIACRYPT 2005读者反馈学科排名

seroma

978-3-540-30684-9Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

ICLE

Lecture Notes in Computer Sciencehttp://image.papertrans.cn/a/image/147455.jpg

盖他为秘密

Advances in Cryptology – ASIACRYPT 2005978-3-540-32267-2Series ISSN 0302-9743 Series E-ISSN 1611-3349

GRIEF

ferment

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-287-79503-9problem in the standard model. This contradicts in nature well-known proofs standing in weakened proof methodologies, in particular proofs employing various formulations of the Forking Lemma in the random oracle Model. Our impossibility proofs apply to many discrete-log-based signatures like ElGamal

innate

Default

灌溉

,J’ai les réponses! Qui a les questions?,the sparseness and the ternary nature of the so-called double-base number system (DBNS). The speed-ups are the results of fewer point additions and improved formulæ for point triplings and quadruplings in both even and odd characteristic. Our algorithms can be protected against simple and differenti

transient-pain

,Fabrique d’images et rituels de protection,ider evaluating an .-party randomized function and show that if . can be computed by a circuit of size ., then . is an upper bound for active security with optimal resilience . < ./2 and security parameter .. This improves on the communication complexity of previous protocols by a factor of at least