Titlebook: Academic Skepticism in Seventeenth-Century French Philosophy; The Charronian Legac José R. Maia Neto Book 2014 Springer International Publi

精明

书目名称Academic Skepticism in Seventeenth-Century French Philosophy影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Academic Skepticism in Seventeenth-Century French Philosophy影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Academic Skepticism in Seventeenth-Century French Philosophy网络公开度




书目名称Academic Skepticism in Seventeenth-Century French Philosophy网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Academic Skepticism in Seventeenth-Century French Philosophy被引频次




书目名称Academic Skepticism in Seventeenth-Century French Philosophy被引频次学科排名




书目名称Academic Skepticism in Seventeenth-Century French Philosophy年度引用




书目名称Academic Skepticism in Seventeenth-Century French Philosophy年度引用学科排名




书目名称Academic Skepticism in Seventeenth-Century French Philosophy读者反馈




书目名称Academic Skepticism in Seventeenth-Century French Philosophy读者反馈学科排名

不可救药

hyperuricemia

0066-6610 t than Pyrrhonism in Early Modern Philosophy.Provides new re.This book is the first systematic account of Pierre Charron’s influence among the major French philosophers in the period (1601-1662). It shows that Charron’s .Wisdom. was one of the main sources of inspiration of Pierre Gassendi’s first p

奖牌

预感

morale

,Teachers’ Enactment of the Reform,tachment to opinions in general also was a development of Charron’s Academic skeptical wisdom; (4) that Descartes’s use of skepticism and doubt was crucially mediated by Charron’s and (5) that he, like Pascal, opposed Charron’s skeptical view of wisdom, though based on different grounds and for quite different purposes.

hair-bulb

Book 2014Charron’s .Wisdom. was one of the main sources of inspiration of Pierre Gassendi’s first published book, the .Exercitationes adversus aristoteleos.. It sheds new light on La Mothe Le Vayer, who is usually viewed as a major free thinker. By showing that he was a follower of Charron, La Mothe emerges

Mortal

Book 2014is seen not as the target but as the source of the cogito. Pascal is the last major philosopher for whom Charron’s wisdom is crucially relevant. Montaigne and Descartes influenced, respectively, Pascal’s view of the Pyrrhonian skeptic and of the skeptical main arguments. The book shows that Charron’

桶去微染

CLAMP