设为首页收藏本站
开启辅助访问 切换到窄版

 找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步，快速开始

扫一扫，访问微社区

  • ALL
  • Journals
  • Books

派博传思国际中心 »期刊书目

› BOOKS
› BOOKS with Alphabet A (Aa, Ab,Ac, Ad, Ae…... )

123456下一页
返回列表

Titlebook: Academic Scepticism in the Development of Early Modern Philosophy; Plínio Junqueira Smith,Sébastien Charles Book 2017 Springer Internation

[复制链接]
查看: 38332|回复: 59
发表于 2025-3-21 18:37:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
期刊全称Academic Scepticism in the Development of Early Modern Philosophy
影响因子2023Plínio Junqueira Smith,Sébastien Charles
视频video
发行地址Is the first to provide a general assessment of Academic Scepticism in Early Modern Philosophy.Is the first to be wholly devoted to this important but largely neglected issue.Brings together a group o
学科分类International Archives of the History of Ideas‘ Archives internationales d‘histoire des idées
图书封面Titlebook: Academic Scepticism in the Development of Early Modern Philosophy; Plínio Junqueira Smith,Sébastien Charles Book 2017 Springer Internation
影响因子This book explores how far some leading philosophers, from Montaigne to Hume, used Academic Scepticism to build their own brand of scepticism or took it as its main sceptical target. The book offers a detailed view of the main modern key figures, including Sanches, Charron, La Mothe Le Vayer, Bacon, Gassendi, Descartes, Malebranche, Pascal, Foucher, Huet, and Bayle. In addition, it provides a comprehensive assessment of the role of Academic Scepticism in Early Modern philosophy and a complete survey of the period. As a whole, the book offers a basis for a new, balanced assessment of the role played by scepticism in both its forms. Since Richard Popkin‘s works, there has been considerable interest in the role played by Pyrrhonian Scepticism in Early Modern Philosophy. Comparatively, Academic Scepticism was much neglected by scholars, despite some scattered important contributions. Furthermore, a general assessment of the presence of Academic Scepticism in Early Modern Philosophy is lacking. This book fills the void.
Pindex Book 2017
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Academic Scepticism in the Development of Early Modern Philosophy影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Academic Scepticism in the Development of Early Modern Philosophy影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Academic Scepticism in the Development of Early Modern Philosophy网络公开度




书目名称Academic Scepticism in the Development of Early Modern Philosophy网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Academic Scepticism in the Development of Early Modern Philosophy被引频次




书目名称Academic Scepticism in the Development of Early Modern Philosophy被引频次学科排名




书目名称Academic Scepticism in the Development of Early Modern Philosophy年度引用




书目名称Academic Scepticism in the Development of Early Modern Philosophy年度引用学科排名




书目名称Academic Scepticism in the Development of Early Modern Philosophy读者反馈




书目名称Academic Scepticism in the Development of Early Modern Philosophy读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
1.jpg
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics
2.jpg
 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty
3.jpg
 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory
4.jpg
 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance
5.jpg
 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage
您所在的用户组没有投票权限
滋养物质
回复

举报

发表于 2025-3-21 22:35:13 | 显示全部楼层
Harbor
回复

举报

发表于 2025-3-22 01:08:23 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45424-5Academic Scepticism; Disagreement and Academic Skepticism; Doubt and Belief; Empiricism and Certainty; F
Concerto
回复

举报

发表于 2025-3-22 05:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
吞噬
回复

举报

发表于 2025-3-22 12:46:01 | 显示全部楼层
Torrid
回复

举报

发表于 2025-3-22 16:33:15 | 显示全部楼层
FRAUD
回复

举报

发表于 2025-3-22 18:50:07 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92762-2harron, il s’agit d’initier le disciple à une certaine manière de penser et d’agir fréquente dans l’Antiquité, mais qui serait peu à peu tombée dans l’oubli. La perspective pédagogique du traité et la critique qui y est faite des artifices de la culture étant essentielles à son interprétation, nous
灵敏
回复

举报

发表于 2025-3-23 00:41:10 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92762-2ère au concept de vraisemblable (ou probable). Le vraisemblable n’intervient pas spécifiquement dans le cadre d’une théorie sceptique de l’action, comme dans l’Académie sceptique, mais plutôt dans la pesée intellectuelle des arguments, et à des fins de neutralisation. Plus exactement, La Mothe Le Va
Harrowing
回复

举报

发表于 2025-3-23 01:28:14 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92762-2s sources throughout his large .. It shall also analyze Bacon’s approach against the background of his intellectual milieu, looking particularly at Renaissance readings of scepticism as developed by Guillaume Salluste du Bartas, Pierre de la Primaudaye, Fulke Greville, and John Davies. It shall show
高歌
回复

举报

发表于 2025-3-23 07:01:34 | 显示全部楼层
变量
回复

举报

下一页 »
123456下一页
返回列表
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-18 18:12
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表