Titlebook: Absent Management in Banking; How Banks Fail and C Christian Dinesen Book 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclu

转变

书目名称Absent Management in Banking影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Absent Management in Banking影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Absent Management in Banking网络公开度




书目名称Absent Management in Banking网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Absent Management in Banking被引频次




书目名称Absent Management in Banking被引频次学科排名




书目名称Absent Management in Banking年度引用




书目名称Absent Management in Banking年度引用学科排名




书目名称Absent Management in Banking读者反馈




书目名称Absent Management in Banking读者反馈学科排名

DEI

FOLLY

Georgios I. Doukidis,Ray J. Paulal communication, mutual criticism and intermarriages contributed to achieving banking dominance and fabulous wealth. Industrialisation, wars and revolutions almost brought down single Rothschild banks, but diversification and mutual support overcame all challenges. The Rothschilds were instrumental

流浪

裹住

Georgios I. Doukidis,Ray J. Paulworld opened up to increasing foreign investment, more banks followed the first multinational bank, Citi, and these banks became multinational with all the complex challenges this brought. Some believed that soon a few global banks would dominate, as had happened in other industries. The 1990s saw e

Cytology

J. C. Thorpe,A. Marr,R. S. Slackion of commercial deposit-taking and investment banks, with much larger combined balance sheets, enabled significantly increased trading for the banks’ own account. The mergers were often paid with shares, and many banks not already listed on stock exchanges did so in the 1980s and 1990s. Large bank

顶点

Yiran Tan,Stephen Bacchi,Weng Onn Chan for management. When banks were mainly partnerships, one incentive for the partners was to keep the bank from failing. Once banks listed on stock exchanges, incentives became shorter term. They were about a high share price of the bank rather than its survival. Annual bonuses became path dependent

admission

腼腆

Carcinogen

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97269-1ncial crisis. Lehman Brothers’ uncontrolled growth was financed by remarkably increased leverage. Its risk management had been trumpeted as a strength, but complexity was beyond management. Incentives were vast and awarded for achieving growth. When the government refused to support Lehman Brother a