Titlebook: A Theory of Tutelary Relationships; Cristiano Castelfranchi Book 2022 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive lic

审问,审讯

归功于

放大

moribund

罐里有戒指

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7985-1637-3argue why it is fundamental to ground this social-science construct on psychological/cognitive notions, like human ‘gnoseological deficit’; of our “rationality biases” but of just of our understanding and knowledge. We discuss why it’s so disturbing/problematic—the assiom that somebody might know be

Magisterial

Jung im Alter? Die psychologische Dimension,l adoption’: X makes Y’s purpose his own; Y’s need/desire becomes X’s purpose. How? Why? ‘Dependence’ of Y from X relative to his goal Gy: Y has not the ‘power’ of achieving his goal, while X would have the power to realize Y’s goal. Y ‘depends’ on X: he can realize his goal only if X acts. ‘Autonom

剥削

B. Brosig,S. N. Euler,E. Brähler,U. Gielertended ‘functions’/goals of Tutelage; two kinds of finalism..Y’s attitudes about his dependence on X’s tutelage, power and influence. His limited understanding: who pursue a goal assigned to him doesn’t necessarily understand the ends of that goal. Why subjection is not necessarily imposed but can b

GEN

分期付款

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7985-1637-3orm of tutelage, from the interpersonal to the economic and political layer (e.g., opposition to welfare state). True “paternalism” is a manipulatory and selfish pseudo-tutelary attitude. Do Y’s (a posteriori) consent? And his satisfaction makes less manipulatory/paternalistic X’s intervention/decis

无政府主义者

Jung im Alter? Die psychologische Dimension,ng our behavior. Normative representations and motivation; why we should obey/adhere to. Norms prescribe minds. Values and non-instrumental adhesion. Any recognized “right” implies a “duty” for somebody else. Any “duty” protects somebody (tutelarity). Education as internalized disciplines: becoming