Titlebook: A Pragmatist Orientation for the Social Sciences in Climate Policy; How to Make Integrat Martin Kowarsch Book 2016 Springer International P

ANIM

Michael Oberguggenberger,Alexander Ostermannhough not exclusively, true for climate change mitigation where many socially relevant aspects are still poorly understood. Section . introduces the highly influential Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and its integrated economic assessments, particularly those of IPCC Working Group I

Pseudoephedrine

https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-27564-9nce, policy-relevance and political legitimacy. Section . provides some examples in terms of existing criticism of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), and, finally, Sect. . identifies the trade-offs between the general norms for scientific expertise in public policy as being the ke

FACT

https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-27564-9c and the legitimisation models of the role of scientific expertise in policy; these four models are prevalent in practice. Section . explains core common characteristics of these prevalent models. The systematic analysis of the four models – particularly their philosophical assumptions on scientifi

facilitate

Noisome

Michael Oberguggenberger,Alexander Ostermannpragmatic science-policy model based on this Deweyan-Putnamian pragmatism. In a highly interdisciplinary manner, and jointly with stakeholders and the public, this refined pragmatic model suggests (i) careful exploration of alternative problem framings and (ii) critical reflection on different polic

有毒

CLASP

confide

Dysplasia

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-21607-1ms of (i) considerable research gaps regarding retrospective, social-science policy analysis, and (ii) political disputes over value-laden findings with far-reaching implications for domestic policies. All things considered, however, both the AR4 and the AR5 did a good job. In contrast to some exist

运动性