找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: A Philosophical Critique of Empirical Arguments for Postmortem Survival; Michael Sudduth Book 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The A

[复制链接]
查看: 44317|回复: 49
发表于 2025-3-21 16:17:58 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
期刊全称A Philosophical Critique of Empirical Arguments for Postmortem Survival
影响因子2023Michael Sudduth
视频video
学科分类Palgrave Frontiers in Philosophy of Religion
图书封面Titlebook: A Philosophical Critique of Empirical Arguments for Postmortem Survival;  Michael Sudduth Book 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The A
影响因子Sudduth provides a critical exploration of classical empirical arguments for survival arguments that purport to show that data collected from ostensibly paranormal phenomena constitute good evidence for the survival of the self after death. Utilizing the conceptual tools of formal epistemology, he argues that classical arguments are unsuccessful.
Pindex Book 2016
The information of publication is updating

书目名称A Philosophical Critique of Empirical Arguments for Postmortem Survival影响因子(影响力)




书目名称A Philosophical Critique of Empirical Arguments for Postmortem Survival影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称A Philosophical Critique of Empirical Arguments for Postmortem Survival网络公开度




书目名称A Philosophical Critique of Empirical Arguments for Postmortem Survival网络公开度学科排名




书目名称A Philosophical Critique of Empirical Arguments for Postmortem Survival被引频次




书目名称A Philosophical Critique of Empirical Arguments for Postmortem Survival被引频次学科排名




书目名称A Philosophical Critique of Empirical Arguments for Postmortem Survival年度引用




书目名称A Philosophical Critique of Empirical Arguments for Postmortem Survival年度引用学科排名




书目名称A Philosophical Critique of Empirical Arguments for Postmortem Survival读者反馈




书目名称A Philosophical Critique of Empirical Arguments for Postmortem Survival读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 22:30:04 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 00:52:09 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0020591And the evidence will be otherwise improbable just if there is no rival hypothesis with significant prior probability that leads us to expect the evidence at least as well as does the survival hypothesis.
发表于 2025-3-22 07:35:59 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 09:17:48 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 14:14:33 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 20:25:43 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 00:51:00 | 显示全部楼层
Introduction: The Classical Empirical Survival Debate,, 2002a,b; Krapivin and Vilkova, 1990; Nitu ., 2000a,b; Svirezhev, 2002). Most of the models are based on the data for the pre-industrial period and predict the CO. concentration for this century. The number of factors taken into account in the models is constantly growing, with the models becoming
发表于 2025-3-23 02:52:51 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 09:27:26 | 显示全部楼层
Mediumistic Communications,rgy resources of coal followed by hydro carbons and their later transformation into electricity. The development of concerned new energy technologies converged upon newly emerging technology of transport and communication which had radically transformed human society by reducing spatial distance and
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-14 23:48
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表