找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: A Historical and Systematic Perspective on A Priori Knowledge and Justification; Ivette Fred-Rivera Book 2022 The Editor(s) (if applicable

[复制链接]
查看: 26625|回复: 45
发表于 2025-3-21 18:29:08 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
期刊全称A Historical and Systematic Perspective on A Priori Knowledge and Justification
影响因子2023Ivette Fred-Rivera
视频video
发行地址The first book to cover Kant’s notion of a priori knowledge in connection to infallibility.Provides a critical examination of Hale’s views on a priori knowledge and revision.Contains a glossary of imp
学科分类Philosophical Studies Series
图书封面Titlebook: A Historical and Systematic Perspective on A Priori Knowledge and Justification;  Ivette Fred-Rivera Book 2022 The Editor(s) (if applicable
影响因子This book provides a detailed and comprehensive account of the problem of a priori knowledge from a historical as well as a systematic perspective. The author explores Kant’s views in connection with the possibility of revision, something hardly, if at all, done in philosophical literature. Furthermore, the views of well-renowned philosophers such as Quine, Putnam, Kitcher, and Hale are discussed in detail and are put into a historical and systematic perspective. Finally, this book contains a glossary of important notions offering illuminating accounts of a priori knowledge and related notions and explains the relationship between a priori knowledge, fallibility and revision. The detailing of concepts such as ‘defeasibility’, ‘infallibility’, ‘falsifiability’ helps anyone reading philosophical literature to pin down the meaning of the terms and its implications in this context. The enriched and dual approach the author takes makes the book a very useful and lucid guide to the problem of a priori knowledge.
Pindex Book 2022
The information of publication is updating

书目名称A Historical and Systematic Perspective on A Priori Knowledge and Justification影响因子(影响力)




书目名称A Historical and Systematic Perspective on A Priori Knowledge and Justification影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称A Historical and Systematic Perspective on A Priori Knowledge and Justification网络公开度




书目名称A Historical and Systematic Perspective on A Priori Knowledge and Justification网络公开度学科排名




书目名称A Historical and Systematic Perspective on A Priori Knowledge and Justification被引频次




书目名称A Historical and Systematic Perspective on A Priori Knowledge and Justification被引频次学科排名




书目名称A Historical and Systematic Perspective on A Priori Knowledge and Justification年度引用




书目名称A Historical and Systematic Perspective on A Priori Knowledge and Justification年度引用学科排名




书目名称A Historical and Systematic Perspective on A Priori Knowledge and Justification读者反馈




书目名称A Historical and Systematic Perspective on A Priori Knowledge and Justification读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-22 00:11:37 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 01:12:21 | 显示全部楼层
Ivette Fred-RiveraThe first book to cover Kant’s notion of a priori knowledge in connection to infallibility.Provides a critical examination of Hale’s views on a priori knowledge and revision.Contains a glossary of imp
发表于 2025-3-22 07:36:22 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 09:30:46 | 显示全部楼层
A Historical and Systematic Perspective on A Priori Knowledge and Justification978-3-031-06874-4Series ISSN 0921-8599 Series E-ISSN 2542-8349
发表于 2025-3-22 13:57:55 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 17:19:06 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 21:21:38 | 显示全部楼层
Palash Dey,Arnab Maiti,Amatya Sharmaresponses we have inherited from his analysis of the notion. In particular, I find very helpful to try to answer the question whether Kant thought, or his view implies, that a priori knowledge involves (entails) some sort of infallibility..The most important questions of the first chapter are: (a) w
发表于 2025-3-23 03:33:33 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06391-1r, first, his discussion of these matters has been enormously influential, and, second, it is a discussion which leaves its opponents – defenders of a prioricity and analyticity – with interesting lines of investigation still open. I argue for two main points: first that a priori knowledge does not
发表于 2025-3-23 07:08:25 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-20 17:03
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表