找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Writing Future Worlds; An Anthropologist Ex Ulf Hannerz Book 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016 Literary anthropolog

[复制链接]
楼主: Agitated
发表于 2025-3-26 21:16:43 | 显示全部楼层
Writing Future Worlds978-3-319-31262-0Series ISSN 2946-4218 Series E-ISSN 2946-4226
发表于 2025-3-27 02:33:34 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-27 05:30:40 | 显示全部楼层
,Chapter 1 The “One Big Thing” Quintet & Co,eir most important writings. The authors discussed include Francis Fukuyama, Samuel Huntington, Thomas Friedman, Robert Kaplan, Paul Kennedy, Benjamin Barber, Joseph Nye, Timothy Garton Ash and Niall Ferguson.
发表于 2025-3-27 12:41:48 | 显示全部楼层
Chapter 3 Playing with Maps,the future. The concept of “civilizations” as a source of identity is discussed; the view of parts of the world as regions of anarchy and disorder is outlined and scrutinized; and the debate over differences in world views between Europe and North America, especially in the beginning twenty-first century is identified.
发表于 2025-3-27 14:34:49 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-27 21:43:10 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31262-0Literary anthropology; Social anthropology; Publishing theory; Public policy; Literary critique; Cultural
发表于 2025-3-27 23:59:16 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-28 04:22:02 | 显示全部楼层
Towards a New Paradigm for Positive Practice,tween juvenile crime, justice and broader social economic and political developments meant that both positions were victims of time and change. Being wedded to theories which only addressed one variable in the complex equation of crime, justice and victimisation, they were destined to be overtaken by events.
发表于 2025-3-28 09:38:44 | 显示全部楼层
How to Build New Hypothesesus to introduce the concept of .-. as one of the main characters of the abductive inferences to new hypotheses. Thanks to these examples we can gain a new vivid perspective on the “constitutive” eco-cognitive character of building hypotheses through abduction.
发表于 2025-3-28 14:07:48 | 显示全部楼层
Mar Jimeno-Bulnestempts, for example, to compare national education systems. Moreover, a comparison of the national definitions of concepts such as "private household" reveals several different historically and culturally shaped underlying concepts. Indeed, some European countries do not even have a word for  "priva
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-17 04:05
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表