找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: William Godwin and Thomas Robert Malthus; Economics, Justice, David Reisman Book 2024 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), und

[复制链接]
查看: 49243|回复: 48
发表于 2025-3-21 17:07:52 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称William Godwin and Thomas Robert Malthus
副标题Economics, Justice,
编辑David Reisman
视频video
概述Provides insight into the overlooked dialogue between Thomas Malthus and William Godwin.Highlights early debates on social attitudes towards poverty and the role of state intervention.Shows the influe
图书封面Titlebook: William Godwin and Thomas Robert Malthus; Economics, Justice,  David Reisman Book 2024 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), und
描述.This book explores the lifelong dialogue between Thomas Robert Malthus and the libertarian anarchist William Godwin. Shedding light on important topics in the history of economic and political thought, it examines Godwin’s rejection of the new industrial order and his insights into a post-acquisitive, post-conflictual future. It shows that Malthus felt Godwin had neglected the ever-increasing pressure of population on scarce food and that control could not be superseded by automaticity so long as the productivity of the land was limited by the law of nature...Godwin and Malthus situated their views on population in the broader context of individual choice, property rights, normative constraint and the status of the poor.  Godwin and Malthus were committed to an economy that was equitable as well as efficient. Their proposals for social betterment make the book relevant to contemporary debates even as it sheds light on two giant thinkers of the past..
出版日期Book 2024
关键词Thomas Robert Malthus; William Godwin; Social attitudes towards poverty; State intervention; Freedom of
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-62113-0
isbn_softcover978-3-031-62115-4
isbn_ebook978-3-031-62113-0
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerl
The information of publication is updating

书目名称William Godwin and Thomas Robert Malthus影响因子(影响力)




书目名称William Godwin and Thomas Robert Malthus影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称William Godwin and Thomas Robert Malthus网络公开度




书目名称William Godwin and Thomas Robert Malthus网络公开度学科排名




书目名称William Godwin and Thomas Robert Malthus被引频次




书目名称William Godwin and Thomas Robert Malthus被引频次学科排名




书目名称William Godwin and Thomas Robert Malthus年度引用




书目名称William Godwin and Thomas Robert Malthus年度引用学科排名




书目名称William Godwin and Thomas Robert Malthus读者反馈




书目名称William Godwin and Thomas Robert Malthus读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 23:28:56 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 03:47:25 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 07:27:09 | 显示全部楼层
Justice: The Truth,son alone, progress towards perfectibility is inevitable. Following Hume and Hartley, both Godwin and Malthus believed that sense perception and regularity of association were the best-possible proxies and that the same methodology could be applied in the human sciences. The future is estimated usin
发表于 2025-3-22 10:57:51 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 15:59:45 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 18:02:22 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 22:25:18 | 显示全部楼层
,Godwin’s ,d in 1797. The . expands on the topics in the . It is critical of market economics, the profit motive, invidious comparison, state education and private property. It argues for social norms and standards. Production, consumption, distribution and exchange should be governed by the true needs of the
发表于 2025-3-23 01:22:00 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 07:31:22 | 显示全部楼层
The ,ng away of the state. The French Revolution had failed. In his . (1801) Godwin refuted their key arguments. He continued to defend universal benevolence against those who said (with Adam Smith) that kindliness begins at home with family and friends. Godwin knew that he was frequently regarded as col
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-7-5 02:53
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表