找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Why Can‘t Philosophers Laugh?; Katrin Froese Book 2017 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2017 Confucius.Zhuangzi.Chan Buddhi

[复制链接]
查看: 44755|回复: 39
发表于 2025-3-21 18:44:49 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Why Can‘t Philosophers Laugh?
编辑Katrin Froese
视频video
概述Methodological study of humor and its philosophical value.Melds Chinese and Western philosophy in pursuit of an understanding of laughter.Argues that the comic is not antithetical to philosophy, but i
图书封面Titlebook: Why Can‘t Philosophers Laugh?;  Katrin Froese Book 2017 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2017 Confucius.Zhuangzi.Chan Buddhi
描述.This book analyzes Western and Chinese philosophical texts to determine why laughter and the comic have not been a major part of philosophical discourse. Katrin Froese maintains that many philosophical accounts of laughter try to unearth laughter‘s purpose, thereby rendering it secondary to the intentional and purposive aspects of human nature that impel us to philosophize. Froese also considers texts that take laughter and the comic as starting points, attempting to philosophize out of laughter rather than merely trying to unearth reasons for laughter. The book proposes that continuously unraveling philosophical assumptions through the comic and laughter may be necessary to live well..
出版日期Book 2017
关键词Confucius; Zhuangzi; Chan Buddhism; Nietzsche; Kierkegaard; Schopenhauer
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55044-2
isbn_softcover978-3-319-85552-3
isbn_ebook978-3-319-55044-2
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2017
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Why Can‘t Philosophers Laugh?影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Why Can‘t Philosophers Laugh?影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Why Can‘t Philosophers Laugh?网络公开度




书目名称Why Can‘t Philosophers Laugh?网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Why Can‘t Philosophers Laugh?被引频次




书目名称Why Can‘t Philosophers Laugh?被引频次学科排名




书目名称Why Can‘t Philosophers Laugh?年度引用




书目名称Why Can‘t Philosophers Laugh?年度引用学科排名




书目名称Why Can‘t Philosophers Laugh?读者反馈




书目名称Why Can‘t Philosophers Laugh?读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 22:35:10 | 显示全部楼层
http://image.papertrans.cn/w/image/1028113.jpg
发表于 2025-3-22 01:47:56 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 08:26:27 | 显示全部楼层
Katrin FroeseMethodological study of humor and its philosophical value.Melds Chinese and Western philosophy in pursuit of an understanding of laughter.Argues that the comic is not antithetical to philosophy, but i
发表于 2025-3-22 11:21:37 | 显示全部楼层
Introduction,laughter, without ascribing to it a purpose. There is a brief discussion of Plato who is often considered the “father” of philosophy and sets the stage for a philosophical unease with laughter and the comic.
发表于 2025-3-22 16:48:52 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 20:11:16 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 00:17:03 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 03:07:35 | 显示全部楼层
We Have a Body!: Kant, Schopenhauer and Bergsonto the physicality of laughter and suggests that it has a soothing effect on the body, which needs to recuperate periodically from reason’s blows. His theory inadvertently throws into question the sharp demarcation between the physical and intellectual that he himself draws. Schopenhauer rips apart
发表于 2025-3-23 07:55:59 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-6-16 16:44
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表