找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Welfare Economics and Social Choice Theory; Allan M. Feldman Book 19801st edition Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1980 Welfare.W

[复制链接]
查看: 12246|回复: 50
发表于 2025-3-21 18:21:56 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Welfare Economics and Social Choice Theory
编辑Allan M. Feldman
视频video
图书封面Titlebook: Welfare Economics and Social Choice Theory;  Allan M. Feldman Book 19801st edition Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1980 Welfare.W
描述This book covers the main topics of welfare economics - general equilib­ rium models of exchange and production, Pareto optimality, externalities and public goods - and some of the major topic of social choice the­ ory - compensation criteria, fairness, voting, Arrow‘s Theorem, and stra­ tegic behavior. The underlying question is this: "Is a particular economic or voting mechanism good or bad for society?" Welfare economics is mainly about whether the market mechanism is good or bad; social choice is largely about whether voting mechanisms can improve upon the results of the market. The book grew out of my undergraduate welfare economics course at Brown University, and it is intended for the undergraduate student who has some prior familiarity with microeconomics. However the book is also use­ ful for graduate students and professionals, economists and non-econo­ mists, who want an overview of welfare and social choice results unbur­ dened by detail and mathematical complexity.
出版日期Book 19801st edition
关键词Welfare; Welfare economics; microeconomics; production
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-8141-3
isbn_ebook978-1-4615-8141-3
copyrightSpringer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1980
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Welfare Economics and Social Choice Theory影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Welfare Economics and Social Choice Theory影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Welfare Economics and Social Choice Theory网络公开度




书目名称Welfare Economics and Social Choice Theory网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Welfare Economics and Social Choice Theory被引频次




书目名称Welfare Economics and Social Choice Theory被引频次学科排名




书目名称Welfare Economics and Social Choice Theory年度引用




书目名称Welfare Economics and Social Choice Theory年度引用学科排名




书目名称Welfare Economics and Social Choice Theory读者反馈




书目名称Welfare Economics and Social Choice Theory读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 22:18:06 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 04:18:03 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 06:44:15 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 08:58:47 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 14:19:39 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 19:53:06 | 显示全部楼层
Allan M. Feldmang protein interactions (.–.), ligand uptake, degradation and clearance (.,.,.), titering of TGF-β neutralizing antibodies (.,.), and for quantitation of TGF-βs by radioimmuno and radioreceptor assays (.,.). Several methods have been developed for the iodination of TGF-βs, namely chloramine T, lac-to
发表于 2025-3-22 23:15:18 | 显示全部楼层
Allan M. Feldmaning six essential activities of PIM and six (different) ways in which information can be personal to us. Part I then goes on to explore key issues that arise in the "great migration" of our information onto the Web and into a myriad of mobile devices. Part 2 provides a more focused look at technolog
发表于 2025-3-23 02:34:27 | 显示全部楼层
Introduction,we ought to have a 3 percent annual growth in the money supply. These prescriptions are all based partly on positive economics (the prescribers have information that indicates the likely consequences of actions that might be taken) and partly on normative economics (the prescribers have some ideas about which consequences are . and which are ..
发表于 2025-3-23 05:42:55 | 显示全部楼层
Epilogue,ke voting, able to show us what social choices are good and what are bad? Are there intrinsic logical limitations to all methods, market and nonmarket, for deciding what social alternatives are good and what are bad?
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-16 17:51
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表