找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Weed Science - A Plea for Thought - Revisited; Robert L. Zimdahl Book 2012 Robert L. Zimdahl 2012 Weed Science.herbicides.historical refle

[复制链接]
楼主: fumble
发表于 2025-3-25 05:58:37 | 显示全部楼层
Pesticides and Value Questions,le consequences. Pesticide technology has not lacked challenges to conclusions about its role and value. These have often been met by pleas for scientific objectivity and dismissal of challenges as emotionally laden and lacking in understanding of the necessity of high agricultural production, pesti
发表于 2025-3-25 10:59:21 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-25 13:09:19 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-25 19:23:07 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 00:03:56 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 00:28:27 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 06:43:28 | 显示全部楼层
Book 2012ion to feed people is sufficient justification for the benefits and harms achieved. A continuing, rigorous examination of the science’s goals that leads to appropriate change is advocated. Weed scientists have a research consensus - a paradigm - Weeds must be controlled. Herbicides are the best cont
发表于 2025-3-26 10:02:50 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 16:26:21 | 显示全部楼层
Pesticides and Value Questions, problem of reasoning with opposing points of view in the late 1960s and early 1970s during the 2,4,5-T controversy. My thoughts were clarified as I struggled with the inevitable value questions (Zimdahl 1972). They are reproduced in a slightly modified form below.
发表于 2025-3-26 19:13:00 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-1 19:48
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表