找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: WTO Security Exceptions in Practice and Scholarship; Curtailing “Trump Ca Erich Vranes Book 2023 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Auth

[复制链接]
楼主: Filament
发表于 2025-3-23 11:35:01 | 显示全部楼层
,Methodological Aspects: Curtailing “Trump Cards” Through Good Faith and Proportionality?,w the review under the Chapeaux of the WTO security exceptions, in particular the good faith standard, is to be operationalized. This chapter argues that the principle of good faith should be concretized, for reasons of international law and legal methodology, by a proportionality analysis, which en
发表于 2025-3-23 16:13:47 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 21:53:00 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 22:28:11 | 显示全部楼层
,(Geo-)Political Background: From Interdependence to “Permanent Exceptionalism”?,nternational) tribunals and national politics. Furthermore, they tend to become increasingly more relevant in attempts to justify “strategic” trade measures in today’s struggles for global predominance. Moreover, the concept of “national security” has been expanded in state practice to cover additio
发表于 2025-3-24 03:21:09 | 显示全部楼层
The Security Exceptions in the GATT and TRIPS as Interpreted and Applied,also sheds light on how the analogous security exception in the GATS may be dealt with in future disputes. A closer look at these reports reveals important clarifications in, but also considerable divergences between, these seminal decisions.
发表于 2025-3-24 09:34:35 | 显示全部楼层
,Methodological Aspects: Curtailing “Trump Cards” Through Good Faith and Proportionality?,w the review under the Chapeaux of the WTO security exceptions, in particular the good faith standard, is to be operationalized. This chapter argues that the principle of good faith should be concretized, for reasons of international law and legal methodology, by a proportionality analysis, which en
发表于 2025-3-24 10:39:46 | 显示全部楼层
Concluding Remarks,ular that the security exceptions of the GATT, GATS and TRIPS Agreements, which have been regarded as the “boxes of Pandora” of WTO law, have largely been kept closed due to the approaches taken in the seminal panel reports discussed in this study.
发表于 2025-3-24 16:01:59 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 21:03:13 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 23:50:05 | 显示全部楼层
SpringerBriefs in Lawhttp://image.papertrans.cn/w/image/1020083.jpg
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-6-28 23:31
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表