Titlebook: (Un)explainable Technology; Hendrik Kempt Book 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2024 Ethics o

burgeon

书目名称(Un)explainable Technology影响因子(影响力)




书目名称(Un)explainable Technology影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称(Un)explainable Technology网络公开度




书目名称(Un)explainable Technology网络公开度学科排名




书目名称(Un)explainable Technology被引频次




书目名称(Un)explainable Technology被引频次学科排名




书目名称(Un)explainable Technology年度引用




书目名称(Un)explainable Technology年度引用学科排名




书目名称(Un)explainable Technology读者反馈




书目名称(Un)explainable Technology读者反馈学科排名

archetype

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-5373-4xplainability, interpretability, contestability, certifiability, auditability, post-hoc rationalizability, and transparency. In outlining the different epistemic and practical purposes pursued with these techniques, we can determine and disambiguate some of the confusion present in the debate, and c

panorama

粉笔

Zusammenfassung der Ergebnisse,e turn towards the deontologically motivated debate of “right to explanation” and their arguments. In refuting that approach on theoretical and practical grounds, we instead introduce the idea of a “claim to expertise”, which preserves our practices and allows unexplainable technology to be added to

松驰

极力证明

ethnology

Chauvinistic

978-3-031-68100-4The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2024

胆小懦夫

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-5522-6By summarizing the points made in this book, this chapter concludes the line of argument. Explainability appears less relevant in most contexts, and in those in which it does, having expert advocates work on your behalf is the precedented, more established, and less disruptive solution.

Nausea

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-5373-4xplainability, interpretability, contestability, certifiability, auditability, post-hoc rationalizability, and transparency. In outlining the different epistemic and practical purposes pursued with these techniques, we can determine and disambiguate some of the confusion present in the debate, and clarify what it actually is we are interested in.