Fixate
发表于 2025-3-21 16:35:55
书目名称Epistemic Democracy and Political Legitimacy影响因子(影响力)<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/if/?ISSN=BK0313302<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Epistemic Democracy and Political Legitimacy影响因子(影响力)学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/ifr/?ISSN=BK0313302<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Epistemic Democracy and Political Legitimacy网络公开度<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/at/?ISSN=BK0313302<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Epistemic Democracy and Political Legitimacy网络公开度学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/atr/?ISSN=BK0313302<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Epistemic Democracy and Political Legitimacy被引频次<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/tc/?ISSN=BK0313302<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Epistemic Democracy and Political Legitimacy被引频次学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/tcr/?ISSN=BK0313302<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Epistemic Democracy and Political Legitimacy年度引用<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/ii/?ISSN=BK0313302<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Epistemic Democracy and Political Legitimacy年度引用学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/iir/?ISSN=BK0313302<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Epistemic Democracy and Political Legitimacy读者反馈<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/5y/?ISSN=BK0313302<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Epistemic Democracy and Political Legitimacy读者反馈学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/5yr/?ISSN=BK0313302<br><br> <br><br>
极大痛苦
发表于 2025-3-21 23:03:20
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-91174-3. This position endorses the truth tenet but, building upon epistemology of peer disagreement, claims that democratic procedures have some intrinsic epistemic qualities. I present arguments against the introduction of the concept of epistemic peerhood in the debate on political legitimacy and end th
canonical
发表于 2025-3-22 00:34:01
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3134/313302/313302_3.png
微枝末节
发表于 2025-3-22 06:29:24
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3134/313302/313302_4.png
慷慨援助
发表于 2025-3-22 10:59:42
The Knowledge Tenet,. This position endorses the truth tenet but, building upon epistemology of peer disagreement, claims that democratic procedures have some intrinsic epistemic qualities. I present arguments against the introduction of the concept of epistemic peerhood in the debate on political legitimacy and end th
Neonatal
发表于 2025-3-22 15:40:39
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3134/313302/313302_6.png
Neonatal
发表于 2025-3-22 19:39:07
Epistemic Democracy,legitimacy, such as Estlund’s standard account of epistemic democracy, which I endorse and defend in this book. The chapter proceeds by analyzing how various forms of democratic decision-making meet the criteria set by Estlund and concludes that aggregative democracy should be rejected in favor of deliberative democracy.
Arable
发表于 2025-3-22 22:24:01
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3134/313302/313302_8.png
左右连贯
发表于 2025-3-23 02:12:18
Book 2020 decisions. Mapping and critically engaging with the main theories of epistemic democracy, it additionally evaluates arguments for different democratic decision-making procedures related to aggregative and deliberative democracy...Addressing both positions that are too epistemic, such as Epistrocrac
固执点好
发表于 2025-3-23 07:36:27
System der Fett- und Wachsanalyse,stocracy, I demonstrate that scholocracy can be rejected as well, since it is not unreasonable to think that some epistemically damaging features (biases) might be present in the group that is given greater political authority. I end the chapter by claiming that the authority tenet should be rejected.