Basal-Ganglia
发表于 2025-3-25 03:28:40
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44602-4Epistemic justification; Democratic legitimacy; Experts; Truth; Decision-making; John Rawls; Political nih
钢笔记下惩罚
发表于 2025-3-25 09:01:00
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3134/313302/313302_22.png
无效
发表于 2025-3-25 13:51:43
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3134/313302/313302_23.png
鞭打
发表于 2025-3-25 16:19:41
Ivan CerovacBuilds an innovative structure than can be used to bring order to numerous accounts of epistemic democracy.Critically engages with the main theories of epistemic democracy.Discusses the implementation
Supplement
发表于 2025-3-25 23:43:13
Palgrave Studies in Ethics and Public Policyhttp://image.papertrans.cn/e/image/313302.jpg
AVERT
发表于 2025-3-26 02:04:29
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-24046-2truth value? If they can be true or false, are there people who are better at getting it right or wrong? And if there are, does this imply that those who are better in making correct decisions should have political authority over others? These are some of the key questions I try to answer in this book.
简略
发表于 2025-3-26 07:12:10
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3134/313302/313302_27.png
圆锥
发表于 2025-3-26 09:33:56
Introduction,truth value? If they can be true or false, are there people who are better at getting it right or wrong? And if there are, does this imply that those who are better in making correct decisions should have political authority over others? These are some of the key questions I try to answer in this bo
挣扎
发表于 2025-3-26 13:10:09
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3134/313302/313302_29.png
medium
发表于 2025-3-26 17:20:18
The Knowledge Tenet,e knowledge tenet (i.e. claim that there are no experts in politics). Proponents of Pragmatist Deliberative Democracy thus claim that political decisions can be right or wrong, and that we should evaluate the decision-making system by its ability to produce correct decisions. However, since the rele