Apoptosis
发表于 2025-3-23 12:36:18
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3134/313302/313302_11.png
Canvas
发表于 2025-3-23 14:21:43
2946-2738 theories of epistemic democracy.Discusses the implementation.This compelling new book explores whether the ability of democratic procedures to produce correct outcomes increases the legitimacy of such political decisions. Mapping and critically engaging with the main theories of epistemic democracy,
大门在汇总
发表于 2025-3-23 19:16:58
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-02264-1legitimacy, such as Estlund’s standard account of epistemic democracy, which I endorse and defend in this book. The chapter proceeds by analyzing how various forms of democratic decision-making meet the criteria set by Estlund and concludes that aggregative democracy should be rejected in favor of deliberative democracy.
Conclave
发表于 2025-3-23 22:19:23
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-85583-2akers devising means (laws and decisions) for the achievement of these aims. In the second part of the chapter I discuss whether political equality should go deeper than just the formal politics, rejecting Estlund’s view and claiming that the informal political sphere (e.g. contributions to political campaigns) should be more egalitarian as well.
cravat
发表于 2025-3-24 02:34:42
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-24046-2truth value? If they can be true or false, are there people who are better at getting it right or wrong? And if there are, does this imply that those who are better in making correct decisions should have political authority over others? These are some of the key questions I try to answer in this bo
IRS
发表于 2025-3-24 07:16:15
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3134/313302/313302_16.png
无弹性
发表于 2025-3-24 14:10:48
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3134/313302/313302_17.png
奇怪
发表于 2025-3-24 16:37:56
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3134/313302/313302_18.png
abject
发表于 2025-3-24 19:15:42
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-02264-1ld not give greater political authority to any specific group of citizens. This can be claimed only if one adopts a non-monistic account of political legitimacy, such as Estlund’s standard account of epistemic democracy, which I endorse and defend in this book. The chapter proceeds by analyzing how
青石板
发表于 2025-3-25 02:03:00
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-85583-2cal labor should be implemented, with citizens and their representatives setting the aims and values the society is to pursue, and experts and policymakers devising means (laws and decisions) for the achievement of these aims. In the second part of the chapter I discuss whether political equality sh