有判断力 发表于 2025-3-21 16:53:51

书目名称Defining Technological Literacy影响因子(影响力)<br>        http://figure.impactfactor.cn/if/?ISSN=BK0264795<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Defining Technological Literacy影响因子(影响力)学科排名<br>        http://figure.impactfactor.cn/ifr/?ISSN=BK0264795<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Defining Technological Literacy网络公开度<br>        http://figure.impactfactor.cn/at/?ISSN=BK0264795<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Defining Technological Literacy网络公开度学科排名<br>        http://figure.impactfactor.cn/atr/?ISSN=BK0264795<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Defining Technological Literacy被引频次<br>        http://figure.impactfactor.cn/tc/?ISSN=BK0264795<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Defining Technological Literacy被引频次学科排名<br>        http://figure.impactfactor.cn/tcr/?ISSN=BK0264795<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Defining Technological Literacy年度引用<br>        http://figure.impactfactor.cn/ii/?ISSN=BK0264795<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Defining Technological Literacy年度引用学科排名<br>        http://figure.impactfactor.cn/iir/?ISSN=BK0264795<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Defining Technological Literacy读者反馈<br>        http://figure.impactfactor.cn/5y/?ISSN=BK0264795<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Defining Technological Literacy读者反馈学科排名<br>        http://figure.impactfactor.cn/5yr/?ISSN=BK0264795<br><br>        <br><br>

废墟 发表于 2025-3-21 20:24:14

http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2648/264795/264795_2.png

Ebct207 发表于 2025-3-22 01:15:44

http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2648/264795/264795_3.png

Stricture 发表于 2025-3-22 06:02:28

http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2648/264795/264795_4.png

infelicitous 发表于 2025-3-22 09:36:45

How to Understand Mundane Technology: New Ways of Thinking about Human-Technology Relationsiteracy.” As a subject taught in schools, “technology” (often twinned with design) makes certain assumptions about the nature of technology and the humans that engage with it. The design and production of technology is often conceptualized in terms of “fitness for function.” However, the sociology o

喃喃而言 发表于 2025-3-22 16:08:24

http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2648/264795/264795_6.png

喃喃而言 发表于 2025-3-22 18:11:11

http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2648/264795/264795_7.png

不来 发表于 2025-3-22 23:06:32

http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2648/264795/264795_8.png

通知 发表于 2025-3-23 02:36:16

The Designer Fallacy and Technological Imagination lay with the author’s intentions: if these could be uncovered, then the meaning of the text was established. One can easily see how, if this is the only true way to establish meaning, there could be difficulties. What if the author was long dead? Or, even if the author was living, how could one tel

Notify 发表于 2025-3-23 06:17:34

http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2648/264795/264795_10.png
页: [1] 2 3 4 5 6
查看完整版本: Titlebook: Defining Technological Literacy; Towards an Epistemol John R. Dakers Book 2006 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Nature America Inc. 2006 C