找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Defining Technological Literacy; Towards an Epistemol John R. Dakers Book 2006 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Nature America Inc. 2006 C

[复制链接]
查看: 49802|回复: 57
发表于 2025-3-21 16:53:51 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Defining Technological Literacy
副标题Towards an Epistemol
编辑John R. Dakers
视频video
图书封面Titlebook: Defining Technological Literacy; Towards an Epistemol John R. Dakers Book 2006 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Nature America Inc. 2006 C
描述Never before have we so needed a new literacy that will enable us to meaningfully participate in the rapidly evolving technologically mediated world. This collection offers a solid basis for defining this new technological literacy by bringing together theoretical work encompassing philosophy, design, and pedagogy.
出版日期Book 2006
关键词Computer; Design; e-learning; education; ethics; gender; globalization; Nation; nature; Passing; philosophy; Wo
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1057/9781403983053
isbn_softcover978-1-137-37346-5
isbn_ebook978-1-4039-8305-3
copyrightPalgrave Macmillan, a division of Nature America Inc. 2006
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Defining Technological Literacy影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Defining Technological Literacy影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Defining Technological Literacy网络公开度




书目名称Defining Technological Literacy网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Defining Technological Literacy被引频次




书目名称Defining Technological Literacy被引频次学科排名




书目名称Defining Technological Literacy年度引用




书目名称Defining Technological Literacy年度引用学科排名




书目名称Defining Technological Literacy读者反馈




书目名称Defining Technological Literacy读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 20:24:14 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 01:15:44 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 06:02:28 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 09:36:45 | 显示全部楼层
How to Understand Mundane Technology: New Ways of Thinking about Human-Technology Relationsiteracy.” As a subject taught in schools, “technology” (often twinned with design) makes certain assumptions about the nature of technology and the humans that engage with it. The design and production of technology is often conceptualized in terms of “fitness for function.” However, the sociology o
发表于 2025-3-22 16:08:24 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 18:11:11 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 23:06:32 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 02:36:16 | 显示全部楼层
The Designer Fallacy and Technological Imagination lay with the author’s intentions: if these could be uncovered, then the meaning of the text was established. One can easily see how, if this is the only true way to establish meaning, there could be difficulties. What if the author was long dead? Or, even if the author was living, how could one tel
发表于 2025-3-23 06:17:34 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-4-29 07:52
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表