Nutrient
发表于 2025-3-25 04:00:32
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2648/264795/264795_21.png
营养
发表于 2025-3-25 08:41:28
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2648/264795/264795_22.png
Dignant
发表于 2025-3-25 14:24:29
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10536-9l that he or she was telling the truth? What of unintended meanings, or meanings that fit but were not thought of in advance? Thus, the intentional fallacy recognizes such difficulties and cannot be considered an adequate account of interpretation.
faculty
发表于 2025-3-25 19:34:35
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2648/264795/264795_24.png
Harpoon
发表于 2025-3-25 23:20:31
Towards a Philosophy for Technology Educationr at once, at one glance, and not by process of reasoning, at least to a certain degree … Mathematicians wish to treat matters of perception mathematically, and make themselves ridiculous … the mind … does it tacitly, naturally, and without technical rules. (Pascal in Dreyfus, 1660/1979)
defray
发表于 2025-3-26 04:03:23
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2648/264795/264795_26.png
不妥协
发表于 2025-3-26 04:53:32
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2648/264795/264795_27.png
客观
发表于 2025-3-26 10:10:10
ed world. This collection offers a solid basis for defining this new technological literacy by bringing together theoretical work encompassing philosophy, design, and pedagogy.978-1-137-37346-5978-1-4039-8305-3
OGLE
发表于 2025-3-26 14:16:49
CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governancess itself. We need to develop a new language, a new literacy, in order to both understand our brave new world, and learn how to live a meaningful existence in it. Where better to start this new literacy than in technology education?
小样他闲聊
发表于 2025-3-26 18:02:16
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2648/264795/264795_30.png