FER
发表于 2025-3-28 15:26:49
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2354/235389/235389_41.png
Needlework
发表于 2025-3-28 19:19:48
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2354/235389/235389_42.png
责问
发表于 2025-3-29 01:01:49
Mania Pavella,Damien Ernst,Daniel Ruiz-Vegals, it champions the notion of “epistemicide”—the killing of knowledge—in the field and argues for the need to challenge the dominant—i.e., Modern Western Eurocentric—epistemologies. The chapter also introduces a new theoretical approach—itinerant curriculum theory—an alternative way to think and to
无孔
发表于 2025-3-29 05:28:48
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2354/235389/235389_44.png
雪白
发表于 2025-3-29 07:47:53
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-4145-1efinition of education and the lethal consequences of a field under the yoke of learning and behavioral pedagogies. It also unpacks the limitations within particular counter-hegemonic approaches—i.e., political economy and autobiographical—dissects the epistemicidal nature of our field and its compl
使迷醉
发表于 2025-3-29 11:32:35
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2354/235389/235389_46.png
无关紧要
发表于 2025-3-29 18:01:58
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2354/235389/235389_47.png
narcotic
发表于 2025-3-29 23:37:45
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-4145-1ntially, the research lens for qualitative approaches. In this context, the chapter examines curriculum as scandal, a lethal ideological device produces an epistemicide—the killing of knowledge—epistemological havoc cooked up daily in the process of qualitative studies promoting and legitimizing a specific modern Western Eurocentric episteme.