找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Universal Difference; Feminism and the Lib Kate Nash Book 1998 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 1998 democrac

[复制链接]
楼主: 可扩大
发表于 2025-3-25 06:17:50 | 显示全部楼层
The Democratisation of Liberalism, it is always concerned with the individual and it always opposes public and private - there are also significant differences between liberalism in the seventeenth and the nineteenth centuries. In this chapter we shall look at John Stuart Mill’s work which, I shall argue, broke with Locke’s version
发表于 2025-3-25 08:45:12 | 显示全部楼层
Post-war Liberal-democracy and the Undecidability of Women,h has become increasingly important in the last 20 years, without, however, being able to displace the former completely. Although very different in many ways, they are similar insofar as both depend on the constitutive undecidability of women between the private domestic sphere and the public spher
发表于 2025-3-25 14:07:47 | 显示全部楼层
Conclusion: Feminist Decisions,rms of hegemony in modern Britain. It has taken the categories of liberalism as constitutive of contemporary social practices, notably of women’s undecidable position in relation to the crucial public/private distinctions now operative between the domestic sphere and the state/civil society and betw
发表于 2025-3-25 16:06:02 | 显示全部楼层
Book 1998ations in liberalism, and in particular at its democratisation in the nineteenth century, and at how feminists have used liberalism as a resource. Liberalism is analysed using a post-structuralist theory of hegemony: texts of liberal political philosophy are deconstructed to show how the term ‘women
发表于 2025-3-25 20:12:09 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 03:22:37 | 显示全部楼层
Kate Nash theological world in general. He is a major figure in the epistemology of religion, theodicy, eschatology, and the contemporary discussion of Christianity in its relation to the religions of the world.
发表于 2025-3-26 07:18:34 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 10:36:41 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 16:03:19 | 显示全部楼层
Introduction,ow, the relationship between feminism and liberalism has been long and, though not exactly joyful, ambivalent rather than unhappy. The study will argue that this ambivalence has been highly productive for feminism and has the potential to continue to be so in the future.
发表于 2025-3-26 17:33:11 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-6-21 10:50
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表