找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Student Evaluation in Higher Education; Reconceptualising th Stephen Darwin Book 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), unde

[复制链接]
楼主: 里程表
发表于 2025-3-23 12:00:44 | 显示全部楼层
Charting New Approaches to Student Evaluation,dels in higher education, there has emerged a powerful and seemingly irresistible demand from students, institutions and even socially for survey outcomes to assure the quality of university teaching. Quantitative student evaluation has become a fundamental—though inherently flawed—proxy means of de
发表于 2025-3-23 15:53:24 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 18:54:07 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 00:33:18 | 显示全部楼层
978-3-319-82457-4The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerl
发表于 2025-3-24 02:40:08 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 08:25:56 | 显示全部楼层
The Emergence of Student Evaluation in Higher Education,forms of student evaluation. Significantly, what was characteristic of these earliest forms of student evaluation was the use of student feedback to directly influence and improve teaching quality. The chapter uses examples of the growth in the use of student feedback in the United States and Austra
发表于 2025-3-24 13:18:19 | 显示全部楼层
Research on the Design and Function of Student Evaluation,ndational epistemological assumptions that underpin the use of quantitative student evaluation data for pedagogical and administrative decision-making in higher education. In this chapter, the broad range of research directed toward student evaluation is assessed, along with some of the issues that
发表于 2025-3-24 17:46:20 | 显示全部楼层
What Higher Education Teachers Think About Quantitative Student Evaluation,ches or other learning strategies? In this chapter, data collected from a broad range of academics working in a major, internationally recognised Australian university is detailed and its implications for the assumed roles and functions of orthodox student evaluation is analysed. This research provi
发表于 2025-3-24 19:12:09 | 显示全部楼层
,Student Evaluation in Situated Practice—The Case of a Recently Designed Program, whether collective pedagogical practices could be enhanced using an evaluative cycle framed around qualitative student evaluation data and based on collaborative forms of academic dialogue. The outcomes of the case study reaffirm the powerful influence of orthodox quantitative evaluation, as well a
发表于 2025-3-25 02:35:06 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-6 13:56
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表