Titlebook: Stephan Körner — Philosophical Analysis and Reconstruction; Contributions to Phi Jan T. J. Srzednicki Book 1987 Martinus Nijhoff Publishers

哄骗

漂泊

Reply to Dr.Sylvan,ary and ampliative; (3) the distinction between philosophical theses which as a matter of empirical fact have so far been generally accepted by philosophers and philosophical theses which are assumed to be “necessarily true” because they can be and have been, demonstrated by some specific and allegedly wholly reliable philosophical method.

POINT

Reply to Professor Chisholm,rtain ‘truths of fact’” and on the other hand my “description of the general nature of psychological phenomena”. For, Chisholm argues, this description is not only, as we both agree, indebted to Brentano’s psychology but is — or could in the spirit of that psychology be — expressed by absolutely certain factual propositions.

MEN

Five Concepts of Freedom in Kant, though I briefly indicated their Kantian character I did not show their Kantian provenance. After briefly presenting the better-known Kantian conceptions of freedom, I shall devote the remainder of the paper to documenting, elaborating, and defending the fifth conception, and showing its relation to Stephan Körner’s.

随意

BAIT

epidermis

Reply to Professor Lehrer,ng some interesting points. They will allow me to explain and defend some aspects of my original position on the logic of inexact concepts and propositions as well as to say a litle about the way in which this position developed in the subsequent years. He rightly distinguishes between a logic of co

河潭

Five Concepts of Freedom in Kant,esuppose others. Kant’s nomenclature for them is variable, and for some of them he has no name at all. Three of them appear to me to be untenable, and the others which are more promising are hardly more than merely adumbrated by Kant. In . I gave a fuller development of these latter conceptions, and

丧失

我就不公正

Reply to Professor Marciszewski, a full and, I am pleased to note, sympathetic understanding of the task which I set myself. It also contains some constructive and justified criticisms. Indeed some of the modifications proposed by him will be found in a book of mine which I submitted to the Cambridge University Press, before I had