找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Social Science and National Security Policy; Deterrence, Coercion Janeen M. Klinger Book 2019 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(

[复制链接]
查看: 18233|回复: 35
发表于 2025-3-21 16:54:28 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Social Science and National Security Policy
副标题Deterrence, Coercion
编辑Janeen M. Klinger
视频video
概述Discusses the evolution of the partnership between social science and US national security policy.Uses a combination of two different theories to illustrate their contribution to American strategy in
图书封面Titlebook: Social Science and National Security Policy; Deterrence, Coercion Janeen M. Klinger Book 2019 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(
描述.This book examines how deterrence, coercion and modernization theory has informed U.S. policy, addressing why former Defense Secretary Robert McNamara’s famous description of the Vietnam War as the “social scientist’s war” is so accurate. By tracing the evolution of ties between social scientists and the government beginning in World War I and continuing through the Second World War and the early Cold War, the narrative highlights the role of institutions like the RAND Corporation, the Social Science Research Council and MIT’s Center for International Studies that facilitate these ties while providing a home for the development of theory. The author compares and contrasts the ideas of Bernard Brodie, Herman Kahn, Albert Wohlstetter, Thomas Schelling, Gabriel Almond, Lucian Pye and Walt Rostow, among others, and offers a cautionary tale concerning the difficulties and problems encountered when applying social science theory to national security policy..
出版日期Book 2019
关键词Military Strategy; Social Science theory; Grand Strategy; Cold War; US foreign policy; Vietnam; us politic
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11251-6
isbn_ebook978-3-030-11251-6
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2019
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Social Science and National Security Policy影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Social Science and National Security Policy影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Social Science and National Security Policy网络公开度




书目名称Social Science and National Security Policy网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Social Science and National Security Policy被引频次




书目名称Social Science and National Security Policy被引频次学科排名




书目名称Social Science and National Security Policy年度引用




书目名称Social Science and National Security Policy年度引用学科排名




书目名称Social Science and National Security Policy读者反馈




书目名称Social Science and National Security Policy读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 1 人参与投票
 

0票 0.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

1票 100.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 20:15:02 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 01:55:55 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 07:24:43 | 显示全部楼层
A Scientific Approach to Development: Modernization Theory,ry. The chapter provides a taxonomy of four different approaches to modernization theory and highlights the similarities and differences among representative examples of each. The chapter includes discussion of the ideas of Talcott Parsons, Marion Levy, David Apter, Gabriel Almond, Lucian Pye, Daniel Lerner, Alex Inkeles and Walt Rostow.
发表于 2025-3-22 08:56:33 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 16:24:04 | 显示全部楼层
Evolution of a Partnership: Social Science and National Security Policy,ationship from World War I to the Cold War. The chapter highlights some institutions that sustained the collaboration and examines some of the controversies surrounding it. The chapter shows why social scientists sought to model their work on the natural sciences as a way to overcome their reformist
发表于 2025-3-22 19:49:24 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 00:15:13 | 显示全部楼层
The Science of Strategy: Deterrence and Coercion Theory,s. Social scientists sought to understand the implications of the new weapon, specifically how it might be used to support national security policy. RAND Corporation outlined deterrence and coercion theory for this purpose. The chapter describes two signature methodologies developed at RAND, systems
发表于 2025-3-23 01:47:21 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 09:18:36 | 显示全部楼层
Theory Meets Practice: The Case of the Vietnam War, The chapter provides a historical narrative that, among other things, captures the evolution of U.S. policy from President Eisenhower to the Kennedy and Johnsons administrations. The chapter discusses U.S. strategy in terms of two aspects of the war: the conventional military one conducive for appl
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-15 10:04
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表