Titlebook: Social Justice; Randolph L. Braham Book 1981 Martinus Nijhoff Publishing 1981 Equal Treatment.New York.democracy.eros.nature.opera.organ.p

脊椎动物

胆小鬼

MORT

A Confrontation between the Theory of Social Choice and the Theory of Democracy, some kind of popular participation in government. While participation can take many forms, historically—and probably logically—it invariably includes the method of voting. Necessarily, therefore, the theory of social choice is highly relevant to the theory of democracy.

折磨

Human Nature and Justice,lications of general principles of justice to delimited contexts. To claim that a social injustice exists is to claim that a feature or practice of a social order violates a general principle of justice. Accordingly, any answer to the question of what constitutes justice will have obvious implicatio

reptile

The Historical Dimension of Justice,rent memories intact. The customary answer to Russell’s question is that we are indeed unable to know this, but that here, as elsewhere, our inability to defeat the skeptic has no practical significance. However, from the moral point of view, the truth of Russell’s hypothesis would make a great diff

LUCY

圆柱

Justice as Desert,defined . as “giving every man his due.” Socrates faulted this definition because Polemachus had no adequate response to the question, “What is a man’s due?” Of course, Polemachus’ failure to respond adequately to this second question really does not undermine his original definition of justice. Ind

infelicitous

ALERT

惰性女人