Titlebook: Semantics of Parallelism; Non-Interleaving Rep Michael W. Shields Book 1997 Springer-Verlag London Limited 1997 Notation.automata.bisimulat

大破坏

书目名称Semantics of Parallelism影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Semantics of Parallelism影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Semantics of Parallelism网络公开度




书目名称Semantics of Parallelism网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Semantics of Parallelism被引频次




书目名称Semantics of Parallelism被引频次学科排名




书目名称Semantics of Parallelism年度引用




书目名称Semantics of Parallelism年度引用学科排名




书目名称Semantics of Parallelism读者反馈




书目名称Semantics of Parallelism读者反馈学科排名

新娘

Book 1997ptual frame work. It is aimed at postgraduates in theoretical computer science and academics who are teaching and researching in the modelling of discrete, concurrent/distributed systems. Workers in the information technology industry who are interested in available theoretical studies on parallelism will also be interested in this book.

Mosaic

osed to the interleaving approach of the process algebraists). Many results found in this book are collected for the first time outside conference and journal articles on the mathematics of non-interleaving semantics. It gives the reader a unified view of various attempts to model parallelism within

土产

Whys and Wherefores,e the case if the entity is composed of spatially separated sub-entities which co-ordinate their activities in some way, but are capable of autonomous action. In such cases, it is natural to speak of such entities as .. Of course, distributed entities usually possess parallelism, although one does n

财政

Discrete Behavioural Presentations,s that an arrow can never reach its target, since before it can get there it must first travel half the distance, but before that it must travel the first quarter and before that it must travel the first eighth and so on. The paradox involves the construction of a series of points regressing in time

云状

Event Structures and Closures of Behavioural Presentations,ences. In chapter 3, when we were discussing what made a set X a ‘reasonable’ point, we concluded that it should be a set which satisfied at least the two properties X ⊲ 0 and ∀0.,0. ∈ X:¬0.#0.. In the event, we also decided that, in order that our behavioural presentation remained discrete, it shou

thwart

octogenarian

Trace and Vector Languages,n nature. For example, in the behavioural presentation approach, an individual behaviour is represented by a labelled pre-ordered set, where (.,→,λ), where . ∈ .. While, being intuitively satisfying, they are rather cumbersome to manipulate. Indeed, one of the attractions of the interleaving approac

HEDGE

Linguistic Behavioural Presentations,ic and consistently complete poset is isomorphic to some behavioural presentation, where the occurrences of the presentation are in bijection with the complete primes of the poset. Furthermore, since each prime in a left- closed trace language has a unique last element, we have a means of associatin

渐强