Titlebook: Security and the Turkey-EU Accession Process; Norms, Reforms and t Natalie Martin Book 2015 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Pub

拼图游戏

书目名称Security and the Turkey-EU Accession Process影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Security and the Turkey-EU Accession Process影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Security and the Turkey-EU Accession Process网络公开度




书目名称Security and the Turkey-EU Accession Process网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Security and the Turkey-EU Accession Process被引频次




书目名称Security and the Turkey-EU Accession Process被引频次学科排名




书目名称Security and the Turkey-EU Accession Process年度引用




书目名称Security and the Turkey-EU Accession Process年度引用学科排名




书目名称Security and the Turkey-EU Accession Process读者反馈




书目名称Security and the Turkey-EU Accession Process读者反馈学科排名

puzzle

The Cyprus Effect,p its opponents. They had capitalized on the geostrategic imperatives which drove the enlargement case for eastern Europe and Turkey from 1997, which meant that at that time “there was a massive enthusiasm for enlargement and a willingness to see the glass as half full whereas it is now half empty”.

兽皮

The Arab Spring Effect,rm in Turkey and the deteriorating state of its democracy. This continues the overarching theory of the Turkey-EU accession process that geostrategy has played a major part in maintaining Turkey’s place within the accession process, although real progress has only been made when there was evidence of meaningful constitutional reform.

Distribution

audiologist

The Cold War Effect,irmly ensconced into the institution — including the UK — and yet its own prospects of membership remain remote. This chapter addresses the issue of how and why Turkey was included in the European process in the first place, and why it has languished for so long waiting for accession to happen. It a

蹒跚

狼群

The Helsinki Effect,s enough for it to be seen as “European” when this was synonymous with “Western” and therefore eligible to, one day, join the EEC. Thus, the Turkish case was made by its geostrategic value and it is unlikely that the accession agreement would have been signed without it. However, thereafter, Turkey

Ankylo-

The UK Effect,the Helsinki effect took it further and began to encourage the kind of reform in Turkey which would ultimately enable its accession process to move forward. It also encouraged Turkey’s advocates within the EU to work towards solving the geostrategic issues surrounding the Turkish case, and the nor-m

Dorsal-Kyphosis

The Cyprus Effect,chunk of reform was implemented which enabled Turkey’s advocates within the EU to argue its case at Brussels in December 2004 — and rhetorically entrap its opponents. They had capitalized on the geostrategic imperatives which drove the enlargement case for eastern Europe and Turkey from 1997, which

landfill

The Arab Spring Effect, fester in the post-2005 doldrums forever. It explains why the EU has persevered with the Turkish case since 2010/2011 in spite of a lack of real reform in Turkey and the deteriorating state of its democracy. This continues the overarching theory of the Turkey-EU accession process that geostrategy h