找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Scientists, Democracy and Society; A Community of Inqui Pierluigi Barrotta Book 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer

[复制链接]
查看: 30023|回复: 36
发表于 2025-3-21 16:53:42 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Scientists, Democracy and Society
副标题A Community of Inqui
编辑Pierluigi Barrotta
视频video
概述Examines the relationships between science and democracy from an explicitly pragmatist perspective.Argues that scientists and laypeople form a single community of inquiry, which aims at the truth.Feat
丛书名称Logic, Argumentation & Reasoning
图书封面Titlebook: Scientists, Democracy and Society; A Community of Inqui Pierluigi Barrotta Book 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer
描述.This monograph examines the relationship between science and democracy. The author argues that there is no clear-cut division between science and the rest of society. Rather, scientists and laypeople form a single community of inquiry, which aims at the truth..To defend his theory, the author shows that science and society are both heterogeneous and fragmented. They display variable and shifting alliances between components. He also explains how information flow between science and society is bi-directional through “transactional” processes. In other words, science and society mutually define themselves. The author also explains how science is both objective and laden with values..Coverage includes a wide range of topics, such as: the ideal of value-free science, the is/ought divide, “thick terms” and the language of science, inductive risk, the dichotomy between pure science and applied science, constructivism and the philosophy of risk. It also looks at the concepts oftruth and objectivity, the autonomy of science, moral and social inquiry, perfectionism and democracy, and the role of experts in democratic societies.. .The style is philosophical, but the book features many examp
出版日期Book 2018
关键词Science and Democracy; Pragmatism science; Value-free science; Fact value dualism; truth objectivity sci
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74938-9
isbn_softcover978-3-030-09109-5
isbn_ebook978-3-319-74938-9Series ISSN 2214-9120 Series E-ISSN 2214-9139
issn_series 2214-9120
copyrightSpringer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Scientists, Democracy and Society影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Scientists, Democracy and Society影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Scientists, Democracy and Society网络公开度




书目名称Scientists, Democracy and Society网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Scientists, Democracy and Society被引频次




书目名称Scientists, Democracy and Society被引频次学科排名




书目名称Scientists, Democracy and Society年度引用




书目名称Scientists, Democracy and Society年度引用学科排名




书目名称Scientists, Democracy and Society读者反馈




书目名称Scientists, Democracy and Society读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-22 00:16:04 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 02:18:43 | 显示全部楼层
Values, Transactional Relationships and the Autonomy of Science, section will examine the problem of autonomy in science. The fall of the myth of value-free science does not pose any dangers to the autonomy of science. On the contrary, it is a necessary step to reaffirm it and defend it.
发表于 2025-3-22 05:59:48 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 12:30:02 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 15:43:31 | 显示全部楼层
Concepts, Values, and Scientific Measurements,ositive arguments showing why science is not morally neutral. At least in some cases, moral values determine the meaning of the descriptive terms used in science. These terms, therefore, are both descriptive and evaluative. To understand this statement, I will explain the nature of the pragmatic max
发表于 2025-3-22 19:10:36 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 00:29:23 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 01:46:18 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 05:37:56 | 显示全部楼层
Science and Democracy,ry citizens are members of a single community of inquiry, whose aim is the truth. After examining the features of a ‘perfectionist’ democracy, I will clarify why it does not represent a utopian ideal by examining the role and characteristics of both experts and public opinion. We will appreciate how
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-24 18:06
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表