找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Scalia’s Constitution; Essays on Law and Ed Paul E. Peterson,Michael W. McConnell Book 2018 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s)

[复制链接]
查看: 31763|回复: 41
发表于 2025-3-21 16:04:16 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Scalia’s Constitution
副标题Essays on Law and Ed
编辑Paul E. Peterson,Michael W. McConnell
视频videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/862/861099/861099.mp4
概述Provides the first examination of Antonin Scalia‘s education-related court opinions.Features multiple disciplinary takes on Scalia’s use of “original intent” doctrine to resolve constitutional issues
图书封面Titlebook: Scalia’s Constitution; Essays on Law and Ed Paul E. Peterson,Michael W. McConnell Book 2018 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s)
描述.This book explores the application of Scalia’s textualism and originalism to education law and reflects upon Scalia’s teachings and his pedagogy. Education law may seem to be an odd vehicle for considering Scalia’s constitutional approach, but thinking about schools requires attention to political fundamentals—freedom of speech, free exercise of religion, equality of opportunity, federalism, and the proper role of the expert. Legal scholars, philosophers, and political scientists provide both critiques and apologies for Scalia’s approach..
出版日期Book 2018
关键词Scalia; Supreme Court; Education; Education Law; Constitutional Law; Constitution; Original Intentions; Ori
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58931-2
isbn_softcover978-3-319-86512-6
isbn_ebook978-3-319-58931-2
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2018
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Scalia’s Constitution影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Scalia’s Constitution影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Scalia’s Constitution网络公开度




书目名称Scalia’s Constitution网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Scalia’s Constitution被引频次




书目名称Scalia’s Constitution被引频次学科排名




书目名称Scalia’s Constitution年度引用




书目名称Scalia’s Constitution年度引用学科排名




书目名称Scalia’s Constitution读者反馈




书目名称Scalia’s Constitution读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 1 人参与投票
 

1票 100.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 23:46:19 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 03:36:46 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 06:17:20 | 显示全部楼层
Scalia’s Rugged Originalismunter that view, Antonin Scalia constructed a rugged originalism that combines textual analysis with a search for original meaning while maintaining respect for the legislative branch and the principle of ..
发表于 2025-3-22 09:30:03 | 显示全部楼层
Scalia’s Teaching Methods and Message The themes presented in that lecture—to which Justice Scalia returned in his last public speech, nearly three decades later—illuminate points he pressed in some of his judicial opinions on issues of education law.
发表于 2025-3-22 13:01:32 | 显示全部楼层
but thinking about schools requires attention to political fundamentals—freedom of speech, free exercise of religion, equality of opportunity, federalism, and the proper role of the expert. Legal scholars, philosophers, and political scientists provide both critiques and apologies for Scalia’s approach..978-3-319-86512-6978-3-319-58931-2
发表于 2025-3-22 19:23:19 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 22:30:52 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 02:15:05 | 显示全部楼层
Justice Scalia’s Unoriginal Approach to Race and Gender in Educationll a different tale. In these cases, his arguments are difficult to defend on originalist grounds and, surprisingly, Justice Scalia himself makes no attempt to do so. Similarly, his views are difficult to square with precedent. It is hard to escape the conclusion that, in some of his most noteworthy
发表于 2025-3-23 08:35:39 | 显示全部楼层
Scalia’s Dilemmas as a Conservative Juristrm public education in the United States. His “text and tradition” jurisprudence was designed above all to prevent judges from reading their own policy preferences into the vague words of the Constitution. Rather than read . as an invitation to judges to join with academic experts to remake our scho
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 吾爱论文网 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-8-16 21:01
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表