Titlebook: Rightness as Fairness; A Moral and Politica Marcus Arvan Book 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016 Morality.prudence.r

本义

书目名称Rightness as Fairness影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Rightness as Fairness影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Rightness as Fairness网络公开度




书目名称Rightness as Fairness网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Rightness as Fairness被引频次




书目名称Rightness as Fairness被引频次学科排名




书目名称Rightness as Fairness年度引用




书目名称Rightness as Fairness年度引用学科排名




书目名称Rightness as Fairness读者反馈




书目名称Rightness as Fairness读者反馈学科排名

Ancillary

温室

Efflorescent

Evaluating Rightness as Fairness, I will offer broad rather than detailed comparisons (given space constraints), I believe the arguments I provide in favor of Rightness as Fairness justify serious consideration of the theory in future philosophical work.

侵害

严重伤害

The Problem of Possible Future Selves,Chapter 1 argued that moral philosophy should be based on Firm Foundations — on truths commonly recognized by human observers — and that the following instrumental conception of normative rationality is the firmest such foundation:

暖昧关系

易达到

Three Unified Formulations,Chapter 3 argued that instrumental rationality requires responding to the problem of possible future selves by way of the following principle:

从容

The Moral Original Position,Chapter 4 showed that the Categorical-Instrumental Imperative — a principle that I have argued solves the problem of possible future selves — can be restated as follows:

WAG